Donald also parrots the line the about Hillary provoking Vlad into war -
And from a rally a few days ago -
Weird, isn’t it, how Donald’s such a flake, but he somehow always manages to stay on message about Vlad (who, you may recall, he claims he doesn’t know.)
If we’re talking ‘dirty,’ he doesn’t go nearly as far as Sen. Burr (R-NC) who was disappointed that there wasn’t a bullseye on the pic of Hillary he saw on a gun magazine.
For about a week last month, to my utter shock, **adaher **actually wrote some sober and reasonably considered posts, and I took him off of ignore (I could still read what people quote of him).
He’s back on now.
Only an idiot could believe something like that.
Well, an idiot typed it. No reason he shouldn’t believe it.
“Dirtiest” guy in the Senate?
How about Senator Mitch McConnell, who has blocked a judicial nominee (not even really blocked, but refused a hearing, refused to let members vote) for over 200 days and has said he’ll continue to do so if Clinton wins? How about the complete dereliction of duty, attack on one of the other supposedly co-equal branches of government, all for blatantly obvious admitted political games? How about every GOP Senator that agrees with him?
How about Ted Cruz, whose government shutdown stunt cost the country its AAA rating and billions of dollars? A guy who so sociopathic he can support the man who insulted his wife? Someone who thinks we need 100 racist assholes like Jesse Helms in the Senate?
How about Jim Inhofe, who thinks a snowball on the Senate floor disprove global warming, a catastrophic man-made disaster that has so far caused weather changes which have hurt crops, costed us billions of dollars, and may in fact wipe out mankind?
How about Saxby Chambliss, who thinks hormone levels in men excuses them from rape in the military?
How about Tom Coburn, who thinks gays are infiltrating the government, wants the death penalty for doctors who perform abortions, thinks breast implants make you healthier (WTF?), blocked the 9/11 First Responders bill, and voted against the Hurricane Sandy bill but later begged for money when his own state was hit with a tornado?
Harry Reid is a saint compared to these people. Harry Reid said nothing that we didn’t already suspect. And despite your lying on what the article states, we know there is a link between Russia and Trump. You see, using your logic, there’s already an investigation into the links, and while the conclusions are still speculative, the fact that there’s an investigation means there’s a connection. That’s your logic for anything Dems do, so you deserve the same logic back. Besides, why should we listen to the FBI now when their director has been outed as a shill for the GOP? Obama should fire him the day after the election, and Clinton should fuck the GOP and hire someone completely loyal to her to prevent shit like this from happening again.
It makes a lot more sense when you replace “Harry Reid” with “adaher” and “dirty liar” with “intellectually bankrupt man-child.”
So how about Trump, and Putin, and Manafort? Who’s “porking” who there?
Well, two can play this game:
Indictments likely in Clinton Foundation case, according to sources within the FBI.
That is an incredibly vague article – an indictment of who? And when? And are these the same sorts of unnamed sources who used bogus right-wing screeds (like “Clinton Cash”) as the basis of their investigation?
It doesn’t really matter. Corruption in the Clinton foundation is corruption with the Clintons.
What doesn’t matter? Whether the anonymous sources are bullshitters who used right-wing bullshit to fake investigations? Come on.
If it’s bad sourcing, then yeah, that matters, although turnabout is fair play.
So you’re saying Harry Reid’s “turnabout” was “fair play” even if it’s not true?
If we hold you to the same standard you’re holding Harry Reid to in the OP, Reid is a freaking saint by comparison.
Hardly. Fox cited sources. Reid just talked out of his ass.
And you never do that, laddie.
You’re just like Trump, a slimy bullshit artist who says whatever it takes in the moment. You, and he don’t give a fuck about accuracy, just throw shit against the wall and hope for the best.
I assume you don’t sexually assault random women, so you got that going for you.
I thought Hillary Clinton was the one threatening to shoot down Russian planes if elected. That’s one of the scariest statements I’ve heard from a candidate since Goldwater was running for President.
Is this the same probe that was based on that “Clinton Cash” book?
If so, it’s not gonna disturb Hillary’s sleep.
ETA: Apparently so.
And per Ezra Klein:
She’s almost certainly The Most Thoroughly Investigated Person In Human History, and nobody’s turned up a pony yet.
But the next investigation - the next one will get her for sure!! 