That is blatant. I could not think of one. I even went to a list of the most corrput CEOs from Time Magazine and they were all investor related crimes.
I think you’re confusing the criminal liability of the corporation with criminal liability of individuals. There isn’t vicarious liability in criminal law - a person can only be convicted for their own actions, not for the acts of another, such as a corporation. However, the directing minds of the corporation can be charged along with the corporation itself, for their role on directing the actions of the corporation, and nay be convicted.
Northern Piper will soon give a fuller explanation, I’m sure. But the liability in that case is not vicarious. If you are a party to the crime, you are as guilty as the perpetrator. The driver could be guilty of both robbery and murder. He’s guilty of his own acts, although he did not enter the bank or pull the trigger.
There was an even weirder story I read a few years ago. Man robs bank. Cops shoot robber. Robber dies. Cops go to robber’s house, arrest wife, charge her with murder because she allegedly participated in conspiring to rob bank.
I work in the pharmaceutical industry and it is much more strict and Draconian than any other industry I have worked in. I work in IT and Operations. I am only mid-level but they make it blatantly obvious that everything I sign can have legal consequences up to and including prison. I work under a number of different standards depending on the systems involved but the most strict by far are the SOX systems. I could potentially go to prison even for falsifying minor document so I certainly do not do that. In that kind of environment, you adhere to pure honesty that doesn’t exist in the rest of the world.
The recent terrorist conviction of Bin Laden’s son-in-law shows this clearly. The man was convicted of conspiracy to commit acts that had already happened before he showed up. He wasn’t accused of being in the conspiracy prior to the attacks, he began to participate in the only conspiracy after the fact.
One doesn’t have to have any participation in a specific act to be convicted of that act.
Like the case Linden Arden cited, those are criminal charges filed directly against the owner in his individual capacity. Northern Piper correctly explained that people can’t go to prison for the crimes of a corporation unless they are individually culpable - and thus convicted themselves.
Ohio Revised Code;
2901.24 Personal liability for organizational conduct.
(A) An officer, agent, or employee of an organization as defined in section 2901.23 of the Revised Code may be prosecuted for an offense committed by such organization, if he acts with the kind of culpability required for the commission of the offense, and any of the following apply:
(1) In the name of the organization or in its behalf, he engages in conduct constituting the offense, or causes another to engage in such conduct, or tolerates such conduct when it is of a type for which he has direct responsibility;
(2) He has primary responsibility to discharge a duty imposed on the organization by law, and such duty is not discharged.
(B) When a person is convicted of an offense by reason of this section, he is subject to the same penalty as if he had acted in his own behalf.
+1 on that. I work in medical device manufacturing, primarily insulin syringes. Management goes to great lengths to make sure our inspections and documentations are perfect. Auditors love to find things they can question.
Bumping this thread, charges were in fact filed:
“Pacific Gas & Electric could be facing new penalties of more than $1 billion when it appears in a U.S. federal court in San Francisco on Aug. 18 to address charges under a July 29 indictment that more than doubles the number of its alleged violations of the federal Pipeline Safety Act linked to a fatal 2010 gas pipeline blast in San Bruno, Calif.”
What will happen? Settle for a few million dollar fine?
This is actually a good example I think for illustrating the individual culpability vs the corporate culpability.
If the violations and subsequent fire are found to be just the unfortunate result of the accumulation of a bunch of individually non-criminal acts by employees and company leaders, then nobody would go to jail- nobody individually committed any crimes.
However, if an inspector or executive is found to have covered up or otherwise committed criminal acts, then they could also be found guilty of a crime.