And anyway, lets not forget, The Onion, is not a newspaper. It does not have an pretence at being one, in actuality.
It only pretends to set out both sides of the argument at all because it is spoofing real newspapers that pretend to do the same thing.
So even if they are biased, even if they do have an agenda (and lets face it, the guys behind it are liberals, its shows through) so what? Whaddaya going to do? Call in some press complaints body?
Actually, I found the Monty Python bit offensive. It stereotypes Catholics themselves, who in fact do generally do not follow the Pope’s commands in this area. The Onion article I do not find at all offensive.
What’s that? After years of writing satirical articles, The Onion has written something that *bifar didn’t think was funny? Yes, they have absolutely gone too far, and MUST BE STOPPPED!
[sub]Er, somehow.[/sub]
A friend of mine says, “The Onion makes up true stories.” (He may have cribbed that from somewhere.)
Of course that’s the whole point of the religious tenet. The religious tenet is getting made fun of.
It’s not just sacrifice of immediate physical pleasure, it’s sacrificing who are you ARE, and denying not only carrying out your desires, but even thinking about them. That’s what is being made fun of, CMkeller. If I remember correctly, you practice Judaism, which focuses on actions. Christianity is more thought oriented. Maybe that’s why the parody falls short for you.
Don’t judge an Onion article just by the headline. Reading it might add depth to the flatness.
It’s “Church Group Offers Homosexual New Life in Closet”. When the headline isn’t ruined by your bias, it is funny. Also, if you actually read the article, it’s about more than “self-sacrifice of immediate physical pleasure”, it’s about “self-hatred” and self-deception just to please others who will never have to make similar sacrifices but find it so easy to demand that others do so.
And of course the Onion is anti-Catholic. If this week’s top story doesn’t convince you, just look at the religion section in the archives for their constant barbs at the Pope.
I love the idea that depicting Catholics directly following the Pope’s commands on birth control is offensive. I myself often perpetuate the stereotype that Catholics attend Mass and take communion.
Actually, the only thing that irked me about the article was that they are promoting the old “Natural Family Planning = rhythm method” urban legend. Yes, we all know the article is all a big joke, but God knows (pun intended, sorry) that there are plenty of people who get whooshed and/or take sarcasm/irony as being serious reflections of reality. For every person out there who never realized that Carly Simon was intentionally being ironic with “you’re so vain, you probably think this song is about you” (which I’ve seen discussed on this board at least twice so far), there’s another person out there who thinks that the Onion is right about Catholics taking pleasure in seeing people suffer and starve while they keep cranking out the babies FOR THE LORD!
It seems to be a common myth that NFP is just a scam the Catholics cooked up to trick people into squirting out babies as much as possible, but NFP uses principles of predicting fertility that are a hell of a lot more trustworthy than the old “counting days on the calendar” method. NFP which is combined with the use of contraceptives is called “Fertility Awareness Method” and plenty of non-Catholics consider it a decent, credible method of contraception (as well as a way to find the optimum time to conceive). For example, note that none of the following are Catholic-based:
Of course it’s not fool-proof, and I would rather see people who can’t handle any more children relying on something which is almost fool-proof like a vasectomy (if you want to joke about people with irrational superstitions about contraception,
shall we lampoon the paranoia that so many men have about vasectomies being the equivalent of castration?).
However, I don’t think that the Catholic Church is totally out in left field here, contrary to the impression that the Onion gives.
While that method has a 3% theoretical failure rate, the actual failure rate is 20%.:eek:
Besides, how long has the Ovulation Method been around? What did the Catholic Church teach before the Ovulation Method was invented? The rhythm method, right?
How come people get all up in arms about the Catholics in that Monty Python sketch, but not the Protestants across the street?
MRS. BLACKITT:
Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?
MR. BLACKITT:
Because… every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.
MRS. BLACKITT:
But it’s the same with us, Harry.
MR. BLACKITT:
What do you mean?
MRS. BLACKITT:
Well, I mean, we’ve got two children, and we’ve had sexual intercourse twice.
Based on my experience and what I have read, Catholics in the United States disregard what the Pope says about birth control. I saw the Monty Python movie when I was pretty young, and I was probably only vaguely aware that the Pope said you weren’t supposed to use birth control. I was confused about why they were saying those things about Catholics, because those people didn’t resemble any of the Catholics I knew. That was my personal experience many years ago.