For those of you who have seen Liar Liar with Jim Carrey, there is a scene where a woman mentions that someone who hurt himself burgling a house was awarded damages. My very quick GQ is: has there ever been a case where a court has ruled in favour of an injured robber (or something similar) or was it just a plot device used in the film?
It seems rather unlikely to me, but my SO and his brother swear that there has been a ruling like it.