Whether it’s a recruitment technique like the Children of God’s Flirty Fishing, a community bonding exercise in Rajneeshpuram, or a means to punish and reward in the the polygamist practicing LDS, Nxivm or Scientology sex seems like a go-to method of controlling people.
Does a sexual component somehow have to be involved in a cult? Are there any where controlling sexuality in anyway wasn’t a part of keeping the masses in line?
The Heaven’s Gate cult was not a sexual one, thought sex was a “human” trait that got in the way of them getting to the next “level” and several members even went through with voluntary castration.
Actually, re-reading your post the Heaven’s Gate cult DID use sexuality to control it’s members. Only they didn’t exploit it but rather demonized it.
Shakers believe in celibacy as a core tenet, and while not castrating people like Heaven’s Gate, if forbidding sex is considered sexual manipulation then the Shakers are not an exception.
I stayed with the Love Family for a few months back in the 70’s. Their main “home” was in Seattle, but I was at their Hilo Branch.
The long term male members were all hooked up with the long term female members. I never saw any sexual manipulation. Young single females would come and go, but I never saw anything untoward. They flipped large houses to support themselves, so we all lived in pretty close quarters.
Well, maybe. But at least some viewers, (as Dave Barry observed) noticed that some parts of the older girls’ T-shirts were closer to the camera than the rest.
I’ve always been fascinated by cults, and when I hear about a new one, or one from the past I never heard of, I always ask myself, “Ok, where’s the sexual manipulation?” - but it seems like sexual manipulation is everywhere in places of power, and even places with very little power. The local priest, rabbi, imam, etc…
I think there’s a difference between luring people in with the (implied?) promise of sex, much less situations where sex is blatantly used to manipulate (blackmail photos, threats to expose “what you did”) and other groups that just have opinions about sex (“premarital sex is a sin”). Sex is a large enough part of the human experience that I assume most lifestyle groups would have some opinions on it but not everyone uses it as part of their toolkit to gain/retain members, perhaps against their will.
I think we have to take this approach to find any examples at all. We should also include “manipulate” for the large number of cults which include coercive sexual misconduct on the part of the leaders, whatever the stated rules of the cult.
Given that, how about Eckankar? That may fail the “sexual misconduct” test - there seems to be conflicting information out there. The basic beliefs seem to be silent on the subject of sex (while being batshit crazy in other areas).
Ironically, the Raëliansmight fit this bill. While the cult certainly attracts new members with sex (there used to be gatherings of scantily-clad cult members handing out flyers in downtown Montreal), they don’t seem to have issues with forced or coerced sex. At least, not that have been revealed to the public. Their liberal opinions on sex education and homosexuality appear to have been ahead of their time. When they were condemned, it was for fraud (concerning funding for a ludicrous human cloning scheme).