I work in the zoo field, so I meet a lot of exotic pet enthusiasts.
I’m having trouble formulating this post to be balanced and reasonable, so I’m just going to say this straight.
Most people that keep exotic pets, shouldn’t. Many private owners don’t provide adequate care for the exotics in their possession. Keeping exotics requires a lot more specialized and expensive resources than domestic animal care, including diets, vet care and husbandry.
(Of course, some species which are considered exotic have relatively simple care. I’m thinking here of arid-land reptiles, various aquarium pets, invertebrates - and of course, hobbyists can be very successful in keeping, housing and breeding these species. Horses, ferrets, even falcons, have huge hobbyist groups which can provide information to potential owners.)
My main objection here is people trying to keep exotic mammals, especially carnivores. The US does not adequately regulate the exotic pet trade, leading to safety breaches, cruel conditions and a huge population of unwanted animals.
And, from a zoo perspective, owners of exotics who can no longer care for them often turn to zoos to rehome these animals. Frankly, zoos don’t want these creatures. They are often of unknown genetic provenance, poorly trained and socialized, and possibly malnourished and/or ill. Accredited zoos have their own acquisition plans and requirements, and a backyard tiger simply doesn’t add anything to a zoo’s collection, instead taking up valuable exhibit space and staff resources.
Some people are great exotic pet owners, but it takes a lot of work, a lot of time, and a lot of commitment. Choosing a pet to fit an owner’s lifestyle is a skill, and one that people often don’t take the time to learn.
Sorry if I have offended anyone. I’ve seen the sad effects of poor pet ownership too many times to be circumspect.