Well, my ignorance is in the majority. And now fought.
I am now fully supporting this cause. As someone else said when a Massachusetts judge claimed it wasn’t rape because the victim was wearing tight jeans:
“I don’t care if she was wallking around naked; nobody has a legal right to lay a finger on her.”
No, not really.
Wait, I’m confused. The case that sparked this (according to the OP’s link) had nothing to do with a claim that anyone had a legal right to lay a finger on someone because of what she was wearing. Rather, he had a legal right to “lay a finger” on her because it was consensual. And the evidence that it was consensual was that she was wearing tight jeans that the alleged rapist couldn’t have removed without her cooperation. Still possibly a spurious claim, but not for the reason you imply.
Yup, but it was not in the context the OP meant it. Denim Day is a day in Catholic School where you can wear jeans.
I thought Denim Day was for breast cancer stuff. This is the first I hear of this other meaning.
There’s an Lee National Denim Day for breast cancer research fundraising; we’ve had it a number of years where I work. Never heard of the other one.