Heaven, Hell and Redemption after Damnation

No my life isn’t totally sinless, if it was I wouldn’t need as Savior. Let me clarify a bit. There is a difference between someone who is saved and living for the Lord as best as possible and looking to Him for help and forgiveness and someone who doesn’t know him and feels no remorse or anything. Someone who continually falls into sin and doesn’t appear to care or want to change or even believe he’s sinning.

If you can’t see the differenct between an unredeemed, unrepentant, constant, deliberate, habitual sinning person and a redeemed saved person desiring to please God and living for Him, even though this person may fail and have to ask forgiveness, then I really don’t know what to tell you. I can see the difference, whether you can or not.

I dont have a “license” to sin nor do I desire to displease God. When I fail, I must ask His forgiveness, determine to do better, and go on. 1 John 1:9

No, I’m not suggesting saved people never sin. (See my post to Libertarian, it may clarify; maybe not) People could be saved by never sinning if they could live their whole lives as perfect and pure with no sin in thought, word, or deed. Since the fall and because we all now have a sin nature, that’s why we need a Savior. That’s why Jesus came and died for our sins.

“Pride goeth before destruction…”

:rolleyes:

Well, I can see a huge difference between say… Gandhi and Swaggart… is that what you’re talking about?