The court has ruled in Heller’s favor. 5-4. More information here.
Ironically, my dad just got back from a month in Eastern Europe this morning. He brought me back an original Romainan WASR(AK-47) bayonet. I wish the rifle came with it but what can I do. He and I are going shooting at the firing range to celebrate tomorrow.
As we have been saying: When the Bill of Rights speaks about “the right of the people”, it refers to Individual Rights, not Collective Rights.
I’ve always said that if you allowed them to interpret this amendment as speaking only to a government right to arm militia, then you can interpret the First Amendment “right of the people to freely assemble” as applying only to recognized political parties and only for political purposes. Meaning that a Communist Dictatorship could rule that it allows Communist Party Gatherings, but any other gathering of three or more people is illegal and subversive; and claim that this is entirely constitutional under their interpretation of ‘Collective’ rights.
I agree with the thrust of the decision ( I haven’t read it yet). I don’t think that the ban did a whole lot to stop violence in the District. I don’t think I can go out and buy a hand gun just yet however. I am pretty sure that the District will put up a ton of roadblocks to limit what I can and can’t buy.
That’s not very inclusive of you.
What about us people who don’t own guns, but still think today’s decision is the only one that makes a lick of sense?
Can’t we rejoice too?
[hijack] Then you’ve presumably failed to read the First Amendment, which doesn’t mention political parties or “political purposes”. Which makes sense, when you think about it, since there weren’t any political parties around. [/hijack]
You may now return to your regularly scheduled gun-and-beer-and-nekkid-fest. If you throw in some hookers I’m totally there.