If you REALLY didn’t care about the election, you’d send me $200. That’s the minimum sufficient demonstration that you have to do to be considered not caring.
Since we’re now allowed to declare what people have to do to qualify as caring or not, and all.
And that’s the actual reason we lost in 2016 and will most likely lose in November. Not because of gerrymandering. Not because of the Russians. Not because of the electoral college, and sure as hell not because of society. Sigh . . . the idiocies society gets blamed for!
QuickSilver, the reason we’ve been losing is because too many people in this country are under the mistaken belief that the phrases I’ve bolded in that quote represent two different things.
I’ll repeat. 80,000 votes. Hillary Clinton might have taken responsibility for it, but for damned sure, we all screwed the pooch!
This is pretty much like saying that when a racecar beats a unicycle in a race, it’s not because the car is faster, it’s because the racecar driver pushed down the gas petal. Technically correct, but dismissing the other factors paints an inaccurate picture.
And if Clinton were really THAT much weaker than Trump, you’d have a point, but she lost, because Trump voters were more driven, disciplined, and focused than we were. Trump voters got those votes out, and as a result, the weaker, dumber candidate won the election. You want to know how we should be behaving? Study the rightwingers.
There’s at least one artist out there who describes herself as a “‘Deformance’ artist who expresses her personal experience of living with a birth defect through her art.” (her right hand is disfigured) http://deformanceart.com/
I have actually seen her art once, and I recognize her, but that is totally coincidental - I just searched for “deformance art”.
ETA: Probably not what you meant. But this thread could use some uplifting thoughts.
As I mentioned above, of course there is. We as a people have only been doing it for the past 250 years! We get out the vote, we go door to door, we man the phone lines, man the picket lines, show up for the town halls and election events, and we energize! Ask a Freedom Rider if he gave up his principles to get what he wanted.
Of course, it’s up to you. You probably have a bunch of easier, more fun stuff to do like post here. Just try to keep in mind that if we take begbert2’s analogy to the next step and imagine the unicycle rider beating the race care driver in the contest, there may or may not be extenuating circumstances that don’t relate to the race car driver being kind of an idiot, but that won’t change the fact that no one outside of the race car driver’s circle of fans is going to feel very sorry for him.
You can’t really dismiss the influence of the Russians in one breath and then focus on the lukewarm opinions about Clinton in the next - that apathy was at least partially the product of a massive targeted misinformation campaign - the blue prong of the same misinformation campaign that prodded the conservatives into a racist, bigoted furor.
We actually have no way to accurately measure the extent of the effects of the various conservative and foreign efforts to put their thumb on the scale in favor of the Republicans. We do know that these efforts are occurring, though, and that american elections are most definitely slanted in the republicans’ favor, to a greater degree in some places than others. This is objective fact.
Does this mean that liberals can’t win? Of course not; it more serves to barely compensate for how minimized and insignificant the conservative side is becoming.
And before you ask, I’m going to do my best to get one person to vote anti-republican: me. That’s one vote you wouldn’t otherwise get, so be thankful. And now be a little bit less thankful because my state is red as the blood of innocents and blue votes don’t matter here anyway.
And you know, that unicycle rider was actually world-class. He swept the Lichtenstein Unicycle Championships five years running, and it wasn’t really the race car driver’s fault. His pit crew was pretty awful, and who cares if he was responsible for hiring and training them? That race course was absolute shit . . . for race cars, I mean, not for unicycles. Also, that race was on a Saturday, and that just isn’t fair, because anyone who knows anything about this race car driver knows that he’s always done better on Sundays, and anyway . . . hey, where’s everyone going?
The election of termoup was a fluke. The right wing weren’t organized around it. It happened that all the varieties of far right and hate knew that he was their man, when the left was trying to come up with theories, and they were not alone in not thinking he could win. Everyone thought that. BUt the normal right didn’t know what to make of him.
You have to make it so the haters can’t agree one on person. That’s dangerous now.
Actually you just have to avoid the haters all agreeing while the decent people don’t. Those are the circumstances that led to Trump stumbling into the white house.
It’s definitely the case that among the many, many factors that just barely nudged Trump across the finish line, a relevant factor was liberal infighting. (Gleefully promoted by Russian propaganda.) If the democratic side somehow gets its collective ass together this time, Trump and co won’t have a chance (barring even more dubiously legal shenanigans than last time).
If we go by your analogy, the unicyclist beat the race car driver in 2016. It wasn’t supposed to happen. We’re all still trying to figure out why it happened. Maybe there was a reason why the driver lost to the cyclist that doesn’t involve the driver being a total dipshit. Somehow, I doubt it.
And when people try to make excuses for the driver, it just seems–Well, how does it seem to you? Kind of contrived, right? Kind of petty? Maybe the cyclist isn’t a great guy. Maybe he beats puppies and thinks that Hank Williams Junior is a better singer than his dad. That doesn’t make the race car driver any smarter, and it doesn’t make excuses on his behalf ring any truer. Stop making excuses. They won. We lost. This was all three years ago. Move on.
You misunderstand my analogy. I strongly believe that there are a number of external factors that slant victory in favor of the republicans - propaganda, jerrymandering, the electoral college layout, hell, vote tampering for all I know. There was the Sanders-based division among the democrats and the racism-based unification of the republicans as well. The republicans have a clear advantage, in my eyes.
They had the race car. And, thanks to the unify force of propagada and racism they gave it gas - gas enough to beat the unicycle.
But I’ll concede that my analogy might have been confusing, so let’s swap it for a simpler one: in the race being run, republicans start closer to the finish line. Thanks to the electoral college republican votes are worth more on average than democrat votes are; most efforts to impede and disenfranchise votes come down harder on democrat votes. Republicans simply don’t have as far to run as democrats do.
So democrats just have to run harder to make up the difference.
Too bad I’m in a deep red state and can’t help, but I’ll be sort of quietly rooting for you between burritos and such. Good luck!
I agree with “they won, we lost, move on to the next one.” But pointing out foreign election interference, gerrymandering and voter suppression are hardly excuses- they range from shenanigans to immorality to arguably casus belli.
I just heard a clip of Obama debating Hillary. The point was that it was much more vicious then, than Sanders vs Warren now. But we are so scared and on the edge of oblivion. It is the truth that any crack in the dem face is ignited exploited and amplified by the right, but more importantly the medias catering to the “crisis” that makes them their ad dollars, but that might be completely fucked as far as truth goes, and leading to dictatorship.
The media keeps feeding us stuff we don’t want and isn’t true, and we just sit there and watch until it becomes true.
Uh, it was clear that what I said was not directed at you or all other misguided guys that do not bother to look carefully what they are supporting, but to the rallying fascist and bigots defending such stupid monuments that in reality were erected as a poke in the eye of the ones trying to end Jim Crow laws and other racist things.. So that point stands. Yours is really yet another attempt at misleading others, in this case an attempt to make me sound as if I’m saying that all the ones that support Agent Orange are racists when that clearly is not what I said.
Again, history shows that the Nazis then looked up at Jim Crow laws as a great idea and developed them further. My point is then that it comes full circle when the weaponized bigots of the south that participated on that march did their damnedest effort (aided by Trump) to be on the “fine” side, when in reality they were defenders to the “elders” of the new weaponized bigots, the Nazis and the Neo-Nazis.
What remains is the secondary point I made, it is clear that Trump did not call the Nazis “fine people” the “fine” people marching with the Nazis though still supported fake history and bigotry too; however, as iiandyiiii and others point out, the context shows that it is debatable that Trump was concerned about differentiating old or new bigots, or feeling sorry about supporting old fashion bigots for the simple reason that what Trump did was to grossly ignore who was organizing that rally.
Sorry, friend, but the simple fact of the matter is that today’s defenders of the confederacy happen to think that their ancestors were fighting in a good cause. They’re conveniently ignoring at best, or glossing over at worst, the issue of slavery.