As I’ve noted on the SDMB before, there’s a lot I admired about Zappa, but very littled I loved.
Lyrically, he was occasionally hilarious but mostly, well, kinda stupid.
He was a remarkable guitarist, he had an unmatched work ethic, he was magnificent at discovering and nurturing young musicians, and his work shows a complexity that very few “progressive” rockers can match.
Which is why I’m astonished that so little of the music he left behind (and he left behind a LOT) is good.
what we think of Zappa’s music is often shaped by our perception of him as a person. I found the public Zappa to be a smug, annoying, pompous jerk who wore a perpetual sneer. ANd no doubt that’s part of what MANY of his fans LOVED about him! He was the ideal musician for an intellectual, cynical, alienated teenage boy. Holden Caulfield would have adored him, because Frank and Holden (like most alienated teens) both thought “Everyone in the world is a phony or an a-hole except me.”
I found that pose boring and off-putting after a while. In some ways, I found Frank surprisingly phony and cowardly. What? Cowardly? Yes- when you compose a VERY pretty instrumental (as Frank often did) and then give it a puerile, scatalogical title, I think you’re being a coward and a phony. You’re committing an unforgivable copout, allowing yourself to pretend “If you don’t like this song, well that just shows what a dope you are, because it was SATIRE, and you’re just too stupid to get it.”
BUT… back to the original question. How do you appreciuate Zappa more? I’d start by looking on YouTube for his Bicycle COncerto performed on Steve Allen’s show.
NOT because the music is good (it’s not). NOT because Zappa is brilliant or sarcastic or angry. Just the opposite- he was YOUNG, he was clean shaven, and more astonishingly… he was a shy, bashful, awkward, goofy nerd.
I’ll never love Zappa, but knowing that underneath all the angry posturing and bitter sneering, he was once an awkward doofus makes me like him a little more.