First, a poll of sorts. Which do you prefer; Heroes, or the reimagined Battlestar Galactica? Please explain why you like or dislike them. Or, what parts do you like, and what parts you’re not happy with.
I happen to really like both shows. But in both Heroes threads and BSG threads I’ll hear people frequently defending the shows’ shortcomings by saying “it’s character-driven, don’t worry about it.”
Thing is, I like Heroes and BSG for different reasons, and I don’t agree they’re both character-driven. To me, Heroes is and BSG isn’t.
I immediately fell in love with the characters on Heroes. I care what they think, they say, what they do, and how they interact with each other. Most of the characters have super powers but I don’t need to know exactly how someone can fly, or walk through walls, or travel through time. I love to speculate, but really it’s the characters I care about.
With BSG, I like the characters well enough, but I’m primarily interested in the over-arching story. I also need the underlying science to be consistent. I’ve never felt a personal attachment to the characters there. They’re not my friends, the way the characters on Heroes are. Or Firefly for instance. The characters became my family and I felt like I was sharing adventures with them each week. I don’t get that from BSG. On BSG I think, “wow, that actor turned in a great performance this week, that one scene was very moving. That actor has talent.”
So, I don’t think BSG is character-driven. It’s got good acting most of time, but it’s not character-driven to me.
Feel free to discuss any other scifi-ish fantasy-ish shows you want. Firefly, Farscape, Stargate, Star Trek, Buffy, Smallville - whatever. Or any shows you want, if it’s an example of what you consider to be character-driven or not.
Just today in a Lost thread someone mentioned they’re still watching the show because it’s character-driven, even though the writers initially said the show’s mysteries would all have plausible scientific explanations and clearly they no longer do.
It often sounds like saying a show is character-driven is just a way of excusing whatever other people don’t like about the show. I’d like to pin down what character-driven means to you, me fellow Dopers.
At what point can you criticize a show’s science, dangling plot holes and internal inconsistencies and when should you back off and let other people just enjoy the show because it’s character-driven?