People who say this (and it gets said a lot) almost invariably have no idea what they’re talking about. You are no exception.
As I have said repeatedly, here and elsewhere, and as I will keep saying until fuckskulled nincompoops like you get it: Science is a method. It is not a body of knowledge. The facts of various scientific disciplines are not, themselves, Science. And even “facts” is the wrong term: “best available knowledge at the present time” would be more appropriate. Because your statement, while wrong, is still within an Olympic javelin hurler’s distance from the truth: that “best available knowledge” is always conditional and subject to review and refinement. That information, yes, can change.
But again, and read this slow because it’s important:
That
information
is
*NOT
SCIENCE.*
It has been (we hope) arrived at by scientific means. But the body of knowledge is not, in and of itself, Science. The two are separate, and are not synonymous. You are clearly using them interchangeably, and that’s how you demonstrate that you don’t have a fucking idea what the fuck you’re talking about, and it’s why your idiotic pronouncements on these subjects are so easily mocked and dismantled.
Science, as a methodological approach to the consideration of proposed facts, is largely unchanged over many, many lifetimes, and furthermore is unlikely in the extreme to change, because of its demonstrated power and utility. As a discipline, its components were created, or stumbled upon, a very long time ago, and have settled firmly into place. Some of the specific details – measurement tools, publication timelines, that sort of thing – have been improved, but the core of the scientific method has been in place since long before your grandparents were hopeful zygotes. Falsifiable hypothesis; repeatable experiment; open publication of method and result; consistent verification by independent parties. All of this has been in place during the explosion of understanding that has created our modern world, from Galileo’s earliest mechanical tinkerings through to today’s cutting-edge genomics. That is Science, and that, you fucking moron, does not change.
Incidentally, don’t think for a moment that I believe this argument will have any effect on you. Per my previous posts, I think you’re just a dipshit who is enjoying the attention and is yanking everyone’s chain. Alternatively, it’s still remotely possible that the original diagnosis from several posters is correct, and you’re laboring under the weight of some crippling cognitive dysfunction. For the purposes of this particular post, though, it’s irrelevant. This is addressed to you, but it is not directed to you. Instead, it is for the casual reader who saw you describe yourself as a scientist, and who thought, hey, how bad could that be? he’s probably wrong, but as long as he’s going about things in the spirit of rational inquiry, maybe we shouldn’t criticize. Well, fuck that. You are not adhering to the scientific method, and you are not doing science.
Shut the fuck up, you fucking troll.