I think these two threads were funny.
First FantasticUser accuses Phil of doing something he hates when people do.
Then Phil uses a common FantasticUser defense for something he did.
I actually think they are both right.
First, nothing that FantasticUser has said so far has led me to believe that he is trying to get other users in trouble, or that he has a vendetta. That was just Phil reading stuff into his posts.
Second, FanUse, you should reread the thread, or atleast the synopsis that Phil so nicely did for you, until he was slammed, his posts were very nice and not warlike.
Then he got slammed and gave it back to them. Something I have heard another famous user say. I seem to remember an analogy about a neighbors dog and kids with sticks.
I really do think there should be a pit topic brought up about people who misuse the name troll.
Troll- One who posts flamebait, in order to get people’s dander up.
Thats my definition, and what I thought most of Usenet and the internet consider a troll.
(A good example, would be someone going into a jello newsgroup. And apropros of nothing say that Jello tastes like melted human flesh.)