Inspired by this thread, which I didn’t want to hijack…
So, how do these words (bloody, wanker, pissed) fall in the hierarchy of swear words?
Consider this basic framework from least offensive to most offensive:
hell
damn
sh*t
f**k
(I would’ve made it more comprehensive, but I think that that’s probably the minimum to get a consensus.) Here in the US, I’d guess we perceive them on par with “hell”; where do they rest in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand?
I always thought cunt was the worst swear. As in, “I hate that bloody cunt.” Of course, I say fuck all the time, so I don’t consider it to be a big deal. Actually, I have nothing to add. Sorry.
I don’t know, why should fuck be worse than shit? What about prick vs. dick. cunt vs. pussy? There is probably some feminist analysis waiting to be done here.
Well this is what I want to ask about. I’ve been reading Irvine Welch (“Trainspotting”, etc.) wherein everyone calls everyone a cunt constantly (and regardless of gender). In fact by the time I finished the book I was in danger of starting to call my friends “wee cunts” in casual conversation.
So, is this a much more common epithet in the UK? Is it considered less serious (more like prick perhaps?) Or would his characters be considered particularly foul-mouthed motherfuckers?
Problem is nearly all swear terms in UK can be used endeeringly without causing offence. Combinations of words on the other hand can be much nastier.
“You wank stain” would always be offensive.
Likewise, current taboo’s are always effective
calling someone a “Paedophile” is much stronger than a “F*cking wanker” would ever be.