[QUOTE=gonzomax]
She is not running for cub scout leader. She is after the most powerful job in the world. Dirty tricks have defined campaigns for years. If she does it she is a bitch. Got a label for what Bush and Rove did. Swiftboating and dirty politics defined these assholes. But, she is a bitch. This is not fair. Labelling her and name calling allow you to dismiss her politics. Basically it is unfair and dishonest.
[/QUOTE]
I called her a bitch for many reasons that go beyond the current campaign. She has a reputation as a martinet (travel office anyone?) that has been gained over the years and I believe that it is fully deserved. If it was a guy I would call him an asshole. I guess I could call her an asshole to, but in modern usage the feminine of “asshole” is “bitch”. Not a sexist here!
No you call everyone names.
[QUOTE=slaphead]
Or in other words, situation normal?
[/QUOTE]
No, there is a difference here; the proposed policies do NOT differ greatly. The proposed … tactics? strategy? foxtrot, details may differ.
I took every on-line Chose the Candidate test I could find before my primary, and Obama and Clinton were always within a few percentage points.
So, the real difference is a matter of who the voter “likes” more.
I voted for Clinton because she is just so tough, and smart, and talks about policy (rather than intangibles), but I don’t know if I would wish the next term in office on anybody.
I’d like to congratulate the OP for waiting at least ten words before calling Hillary a “bitch”. Way to show some restraint there, buddy.
[QUOTE=Frostillicus]
I’d like to congratulate the OP for waiting at least ten words before calling Hillary a “bitch”. Way to show some restraint there, buddy.
[/QUOTE]
May all the opponents of my candidate be so reasonable and persuasive.
“You say ‘Bitch’ like it’s a bad thing.”
[QUOTE=Marley23]
I’m pretty sure none of the Democratic primaries are winner-take all.
[/QUOTE]
New York was winner-take-all.
[QUOTE=guizot]
New York was winner-take-all.
[/QUOTE]
Only for the Republicans. The Democratic results are here and clearly show each candidate receiving a portion of the vote.
[QUOTE=Marley23]
I’m pretty sure none of the Democratic primaries are winner-take all. By the time March 4 rolls around, given the proportional representation part of it and the races Obama is likely to win before then, it may be hard to make up that much ground.
[/QUOTE]
Puerto Rico is the only winner-take-all caucus or primary I’ve read of, and even then it could end up being proportional because their Democratic leadership has considerable leeway, I believe.
[QUOTE=asterion]
I’m a woman! I’m 60!
Wow, who knew that head coach press conferences could be used in so many ways?
[/QUOTE]
It is what it is.
Elections? You’re talking about elections? I just hope we can win a primary!