History's forgotten atrocities?

Antony Beever also covers this in his excellent book The Fall of Berlin, 1945. In general, I think there is ignorance of the post-war fates of ethnic Germans outside Germany (a group most aren’t inclined to symphatize with).

Numbers, 31 and beyond…

They were ordered to kill all men and women who weren’t virgins, but to keep all virgins for themselves.

It’s the kind of stuff they never discussed all those Sundays where I went to church.

Since this is GQ can we please have a reference that any Aborigine was ever sold as a slave?

We are supposed to be discussing factual points here, not outrageous overstatements.

Okay, maybe not sold into slavery, but definitely treated as such. I may have gotten a little ahead of myself there, I apologise.

A quick search turned up this page about “blackbirding”, but I can’t vouch for its authenticity.

Re: Japanese Textbooks
There is a huge flap going on now here in South Korea precisely because Japanese school books gloss over Imperial Japanese atrocities especially in reference to thousands of Korean women forced into prostitution, known as “comfort women”.

Also the sickening activities of Japan’s Unit 731 based in Harbin China. They performed experiments on humans (mostly Koreans and Chinese which they referred to as ‘logs’) that made what the Nazi’s did look benevolent in comparison.

Is it completely ignored? No, but the whole reason the Chinese and Korean governments are upset over the new Japanese textbooks is because they significantly white-wash these topics.

The big thing to realise is that a lot of people were ‘treated as slaves’ by that standard before the advent of widespread effective unionism. Talk to the Chinese workers on the US railways or governesses in British homes. Maybe that makes it an atrocity and maybe it doesn’t, but the thing to realise is that such treatment was normal and in no way restricted to Aborigines in Australia, it was applied to almost any socially disadvantaged individual anywhere in the world. And such “atrocities” can scarcely be considered forgotten, talk to any ardent unionist to get a detailed description. Maybe a US unionist wouldn’t know about exploitation of station hands in Australia and an Australian Unionist wouldn’t know about exploitation of gangers in the US nor would a British unionist, but insofar as the above labour relations behaviour is an ‘atrocity’ it is well remebered soclailly and verbally and heavily documented.

This is where this thread inevitably slips into GD territory. Some things are indisputably atrocities simply because they led to numerous deaths or permanent physical disablity, however many people are going to want to consider things like unfair labour relations to be atrocities of an equaivalent type, which hardly seems warranted IMO.

By the way, the carpetbombings of Cambodia during the same war are rarely mentionned, despite having killed many Cambodians. I didn’t know the number of victims, so I googled quicly and the first figure I found gave a estimate of 200 000 victims (but I don’t vouch for its accuracy).