Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Saw the movie last night. I enjoyed it. I also wish to have seen some of the left-out bits of dialog, especially “Mostly Harmless”, and the bulldozer scene felt rushed. But overall, I enjoyed it, and I’m glad they didn’t attempt to just do a straight transcription of the books. I think that’s where some of the old TV series fell flat for me, when I saw it. Trying to do the books word-for-word would feel tedious on screen.

I liked a lot of the added stuff, especially how they drove home the beurocratic nature of the Vogons. Presidential Kidnapper Release Form. Permission to Pursue Fugitive Form (or something like that – when Heart of Gold took off into hyperspace).

My usual picture of Slartibartfast was much older, but I thought Bill Nighy was a great choice anyways! And plenty of fun for those unfamiliar with the series, but also lots of subtle stuff for long-time fans (Gag Halfrunt, the old Marvin cameo, etc.)

I loved the “factory floor” scene – Arthur and Slarty’s ride through the planet-building area. That totally did justice to what I imagined from the book. :slight_smile:

If I remember correctly, having read the collected The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy within the last month, Tricia went to New York to interview for a television news anchor job for which the producers wanted a British accent.

That reminded me of Brazil.

“Listen, this old system of yours could be on fire and I couldn’t even turn on the kitchen tap without filling out a 27b/6… Bloody paperwork.”

No one else has mentioned this, so I guess I’ll be to the first…

Douglas Adam’s face actually makes two cameo’s. The first one is rather hard to make out, and in Magreathea’s planet factory. DNA’s face appears as a planet. In the credit’s, there is mention of the image coming from Starship Titanic the PC game Douglas developed.

I saw it yesterday and I liked it. I wasn’t overwhelmed, but I liked it.

I was dissappointed most with Ford Prefect. Ford’s character wasn’t captured the way I would have liked. Yes, Ford is a little out of place, he doesn’t blink near often enough, but he is much more cavalier than Mos Def made him out to be. This is a man /Betelguesian who racks up an unpayable bar tab in the most dangerous bar on the most dangerous planet in the galaxy and uses the Guide to weasel out of the debt. This is not someone who needs a hug when facing the airlock.

Zaphod was a little too dumb for my taste, Marvin was fantastic, Trillian was everybit as adorable as I imagined her to be. Arthur wasn’t quite exasperated enough, but I liked Slarty.

I wish Zaphod had been looking for the Ruler of the Universe rather than the Question. I really wanted to see the bit with The Lord. Although I am sure that comes up in a later book.

The impression I get from Ford’s hugs in the movie was that he was profoundly alien and he was only offering them as a service to Arthur out of a mistaken impression of human psychology. IMHO, at least.

slortar, I can see where you are coming from, but he had been on earth for about 15 years, he would have picked up on the nuances, if not the sarcasm.

I guess I am just afraid that people are going to miss out on the real reason I picked FordPrefect as my monicker and think me a neurotic, fumbling, sore-thumb kinda guy. When really I am a wild and crazy frood who likes to drink himself into oblivion at the drop of a hat.

I saw the movie Friday night, and expected to not enjoy it at all. Mostly, because I think the books are just hugely over-rated. Not bad, precisely, just only sort-of funny and generally unmemorable outside of a few good lines. Since the movie is never as good as the book, and I’m only lukewarm on the book… well, my expectations were not good.

Turns out, I was very pleasantly surprised. I think I liked it a lot more than most people did precisely because I like the books a lot less than most people did. They managed to keep a lot of Douglas Adam’s main strength as a writer (the clever wordplay and observational humor) while repairing the major defects (almost total lack of plot and character). The actors were all stand-outs, especially Sam Rockwell. Seeing his Zaphod get hit in the face repeatedly was hugely satisfying. I could watch an entire movie that was nothing but that character being beaten with blunt implements. The design was fantastic throughout, with great attention to detail. I liked the Vogon’s hair, for example, which mostly consisted of bad comb-overs as you would expect from someone genetically pre-disposed to petty beauracratism. And the chief Vogon had Dilbert pointy-haired boss hair. Don’t know if that was an intentional reference, but it was hugely appropriate none the less. And did anyone else think that the Heart of Gold looked like it had been designed by Apple?

All in all, a very worthy film.

Not sure if this is available elsewhere, but if you go to Apple’s iTunes Music Store (gotta download the free iTunes software first) and do a search for “Stephen Fry,” you’ll find a couple of nice H2G2-related goodies:
[ul]
[li]“The Marvin Mixes,” an album containing seven remixes of “Reasons to be Miserable” from the Hitchhikers’ soundtrack, as well as a (new and updated?) version of “Marvin,” from the promotional LP that the BBC put out way back when. :slight_smile: No sign of “Marvin, I Love You,” however… :([/li][li]Four audio-only Guide entries, all titled “The Hitchhikers’ Guide To ______,” by Stephen Fry and Joey Talbot. The topics are “Deadlines,” “Technology,” “Blogging,” and “How To Be Cool.” These seem to be all-new material, as I’ve never heard of them before, but are well-rooted in the DNA vein – the blogging guide mentions that a prerequisite for blogging is a massive ego, to ensure the delusion that the stuff you blog is actually interesting enough to be read by strangers… :D[/li][/ul]

I was pleasantly surprised by the movie. I really enjoyed it, I have read the books countless times, listened to the radio show I don’t know how many times, and watched the BBC series twice.

I took my girlfriend to see it, even though she was VERY hesitant about it. She had seen the trailers and was very unimpressed by them. But she, being a good girlfriend, said that she would go because she knew that wanted to see it so much. I was bracing myself for a repay by going to see a good chick-flick soon.

When the opening scene with the “So Long and Thanks for All the Fish” musical number was well into it’s throes, I leaned over to her and apologized.

After that, it was a fun ride. She actually laughed more than anyone else in the theater.

Her new motto is “Don’t Panic.”

I loved that they had the original theme when they showed the guide and that the BBC Marvin was in it. The DA image at the end was great!

I wish there had been more Marvin. Especially about the pain going down all the diodes on his left side.

Wow.

I’m surprised that so many people actually liked this movie so much.

I saw it the other day, expecting it to be bad… and I was correct in my expectations. I didn’t hate it, quite, but IMO it wasn’t very good at all. Not a single chuckle from me from first to last.

I can’t explain exactly what I disliked about it, as it did seem very much in the tradition of the books (which I loved and have read probably 30 or 40 times); all of the characters were good except for Zaphod, who I hated. The Heart of Gold looked really cool, and Trillian was unexpectedly adorable. I didn’t care for the look of Marvin, for some reason. The Vogons, however, were perfect in look.

I dunno… I just sat there and watched, and thought “Meh.”

So, no real reason for my dislike of the movie… but I didn’t like it. Should have gotten a ticket for Kung Fu Hustle. :stuck_out_tongue:

Wow… nice find! Thanks :).

More Stephen Fry as the Guide is NEVER a bad thing. Hmm… maybe I’ll see the movie again this week :D. Best to keep the numbers up.

Btw, any of you heard the British take for Hitchhiker’s Guide movie this past weekend? You sitting down? 4.2 million pounds! LOL!

Holy Coluphid you people seem to be easily amused! Fart jokes and Jerry Lewis must leave you all gasping with laughter!

The movie was a complete and utter dud. It was anemic, unfunny, and boring as Cheez Whiz. The casting was mostly terrible (with the lone exception of Rickman as Marvin’s voice), the acting was second-rate, and the script was an unbelievably wretched pseudo-regurgitation of what is actually some of the funniest material ever created. You’d think they couldn’t go wrong, but somehow they managed it!

I knew we were in trouble when I saw that they cut all the good bits about the planning documents’ location and the (admittedly minor) fact that the Vogon ships were not yellow. Did they bother to read the books? Did they understand Adam’s humor – or indeed any humor – at all? And how do you miss an easy visual gag like that? Idiots.

It was hard waiting for the film to the end – I kept looking at my watch and hoping something worthwhile would somehow rise above the otherwise disastrous melange of monstrously butchered dialog and utterly unfunny plot lines.

This film is a disaster of Gigli-like proportions. The only good thing about it is that Douglas Adams will never have to see it.

This movie was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the movie I had hoped it would be.

The casting was mostly spot-on. I know many people were worried about Mos Def, but he did a great job with what he had. Unfortunately, he, and the rest of the cast, didn’t really have much to work with. Zaphod was annoying and not the least bit funny or interesting. Everything to do with his second head was cringe-worthy. Marvin was great, but horribly underused.

Many jokes were neutered to the point where you just wanted to hug them out of pity, if it weren’t for the fact you were too embarassed to acknowledge their existence. The exchange at the beginning about the location of the plans for demolition of Arthur’s house should have been hilarious and also used to introduce the audience to the movie’s style of humor. Instead, we get, “They were in a cellar!” That’s not funny.

Other jokes simply weren’t funny. “I’m already a woman.” That just left me scratching my head. After a minute or two I realized why it was supposed to be funny. But it still wasn’t.

There were plenty of opportunities for great jokes in the film. Even without changing the overall structure of the film, or any of the cast, I think it could have been made hilarious. I swear if they’d have let me have the script, I could have improved the humor of the dialogue 100%, simply by inserting a few lines from the books here or there, with only minor tweaking.

All that said, when the movie was funny it was funny. I laughed out loud at the animation for the Guide’s explanation of the babelfish. The Vogons were terrific. Pretty much everything up to Ford and Arthur getting picked up by the Heart of Gold was at least good. (Although I would have trimmed the dolphin song and dance a bit.)

I’m glad that other people seemed to like it, and it seems to be doing fairly good at the box office. But I’d rate it a 2 out of 5.

I think everyone’s missing the most important part!

When Arthur and Ford get picked up by the Heart of Gold, and they’re still in improbability. Arthur’s limbs are escaping, and Ford’s turning into a penguin. Arthur’s response? “Ford. You’re turning into a penguin. Stop it!”

I’m of two minds about this movie. I adore the guide books, so I was thrilled when I heard they’d be finally made into a movie. Not so thrilled when I heard Disney would have their greasy mitts all over it.

To me, it felt like there was a discernable gap between the bits that Douglas added, and the other parts added/touched by the other writers. I loved the vogsphere with the slapsticks, and the queueing. I didn’t like Deep Thought’s woman-voice (I always felt DT should be a big, boomy man-voice as well). It was a… Hmm. I’d say the movie’s an okay way to spend some time, and it was funny, but it fell short of the mark when compared to other incarnations of the story. YMMV.

I missed:

“It’s times like this … that I wish I had listened to what my mother told me when I was young.”
“Why? What did she tell you?”
“I don’t know. I didn’t listen.”

What exactly went on after the credits? I missed it.

I’ve been avoiding reading this thread because I didn’t want any spoilers. So today I’ve only read part of the first page. I saw the film on Friday. I did take my DON’T PANIC towel, but my friend said, ‘Bellingham isn’t like that’ so I left it in the car.

Has anyone ever spent weeks traveling about with Let’s Go: Europe? I did. One of the things I noticed about the book was that it contained several inaccuracies (mostly concerning the location of hostels and their prices). I love Let’s Go. I read THGTTG on the long bus ride from Chicago to L.A. after returning to the States. The similarities were quite enjoyable.

I also have the BBC production on VHS around here somewhere.

I… liked the film. Sort of. Many of the jokes seemed to lack their punchlines. For example: Arthur in front of the bulldozer. Where’s the ‘Beware of the Leopard’ line? I was also waiting for ‘It’s unpleasantly like being drunk.’ ‘What’s wrong with that?’ ‘Ask a glass of water.’ And where was the proof that God doesn’t exist because no one but God could come up with something as amazingly useful as the babelfish? When Arthur saves the ship and Zaphod tells him what a great thing it was, and Arthur says, ‘Oh, it was nothing,’ and Zaphod tells him, ‘Oh, never mind then,’ didn’t happen in the film. And where was the big Tea Joke? ‘You mean you want leaves? Soaked in water? With milk? Out of a cow? I’ll have to think about that.’ That was a great bit in the book, and was important to the plot because it took all of Eddie’s resources to do it and that put the ship in danger. And so on. Really, there were too many instances of missed jokes in the film to list individually.

I didn’t care for Mos Def as Ford Prefect. He just didn’t fit my image of the character. I can’t put my finger on it, but he seemed to be lacking some bit of ‘Fordness’.

Deep Thought. IIRC from the books, Deep Thought had a deep, booming voice. Helen Mirren’s voice reminded me of Hattie McDaniel’s Holly in Red Dwarf. And I seem to remember the revelation of the Answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything being drawn out more in the book. They did do the ‘You’re really not going to like it…’ bit, but I thought it played out a couple more beats in the book. Did the ‘Mice’ say ‘We’re going to be lynched’ in the film? If they did, I missed it.

I didn’t care for Marvin. Too cute. I pictured him as much taller. More gaunt. His big round head looked to ‘happy’. That’s funny, since he was so depressed; but it was just too cute. (FWIW, I didn’t care for the Marvin in the original film – who did make an appearance in this one – either.)

Zaphod didn’t do it for me. In the books he was an amoral cad. In this new film he was just an idiot. In the original film, Zaphod had an extra head next to his proper one. Sure, the famous BBC ‘production values’ showed, in that the second head was poorly done; but I liked it better.

And then there’s the ending. That didn’t happen until much later in the series. The ending totally ignored the Golgafrinchams, the cavemen, Arthur learning to fly, and everything else that happened in the meantime.

All in all it seemed as if the film tried to hit the high points, but stopped short of including the best bits in the high points. :smack:

Still… I liked it. Even with all of the flaws and (what I thought was) mis-casting, I liked it. I liked the original film better; but I still liked this one. Aside from the things I mentioned, it really did look better.

The chick playing Trillian was really cute. I’d definitely go to Madagascar with her! Not too skinny, pretty face, nice hair. Find her, and bring her to me!

I’ll find time to read the rest of the comments later, and maybe comment on them.

Given the way the ending was handled, how can they do the next film? :confused: (It’s been a few years since the last time I read the series, so I don’t remember exactly where HG ended and Restaurant began.)

One thing I’ve always wondered, since I read the book for the first time over 20 years ago, was how many Americans know what a Ford Prefect is? I grew up in a family with British cars (no Prefects, though), so I got it; but AFAIK, there are no – or very few – Prefects in the States.

I guess that’s how I felt (see my first post). I went to a matinée though, so I didn’t pay full price.

Agreed.

Same here.

Yes. As I posted before, I’d spent five weeks traveling around with Let’s Go: Europe. Having done that gave me a very nice appreciation of t HG. :wink:

I agree that Mos Def wasn’t ‘right’ for the part; but I think that in the airlock he was insincerely offering Arthur a hug because he thought it was an Earth thing that Arthur might appreciate.

And yet… I wasn’t as disappointed as I could have/should have been. I came out of the cinema likeing it more than I disliked it. I agree with your points though.

Almost, but not quite, how I felt.

Another thing that was missing was the dialog between the Vogon guard and Ford, about weather stomping around and shouting ‘Resistance is useless!’ was a satisfying career. In the airlock, I thought the ‘Wait! What’s this switch?’ gag was badly bungled.

I just saw the movie today. I was definitely entertained and had several laugh out loud moments yet there were bits that dragged horribly. Overall, I’m pleased. That damn “So Long and Thanks for All the Fish” song is stuck in my head!
I don’t think I can form an opinion about Mos Def’s performance as Ford because the movie was distinctly lacking Ford. When I read the books, I had a bit of a crush on him so his diminished role in the movies didn’t make me too happy.
Zaphod wasn’t how I imagined him but I found him entertaining. Trillian was pretty and pointless (she did have an astrophysics degree, right?).
I did get chills when Journey of the Sorcerer started playing and seeing the planet factory of Magrathea. Out of all things they changed, I was ridiculously overjoyed they kept the sperm whale and petunias!

I saw this movie yesterday afternoon with a group of friends. I was the only one there who had not read the books… somewhat surprising given that it’s my genre for the most part, and I usually like British humor. Some random stream of consciousness thoughts:

I was very underwhelmed by this movie. I grinned a lot, but I don’t know that I ever actually laughed more than once or twice. I thought a lot of it was very generic, and the stuff that wasn’t, wasn’t used to its full potential. I particularly liked Ford and the two voices (Eddie and Marvin)… but at the same time I thought Marvin’s schtick got old pretty fast since they kept using it in the same way. I had the same thought as the person on the first page who wondered why they didn’t just get Owen Wilson for Zaphod. I definitely came out of the movie with the feeling that nothing actually happened; this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, as there are a lot of very good movies where nothing happens, but I’m not sure it really worked here. I didn’t find Trillian particularly adorable - pretty cute, some good qualities, but no “Kaylee Reflex” whatsoever (the Firefly fans will know what I mean by that).

I guess I just don’t think it’s a good thing that I honestly couldn’t have given a damn whether they cut Arthur’s head open at the end or not.

Most of my friends walked out of the movie, said it was pretty good, and quickly got to analyzing the differences between the movie and the book/radio series. My parents saw it last weekend: my father, who read the books back when they came out and loved them, didn’t really like it; my mother, who has never heard of the books, thought it was a complete waste of time.

It was a somewhat pleasant way to waste away a Saturday afternoon, but certainly nothing I’d make an effort to go see again, and definitely not as funny as some other British-humor-type comedies that I’ve seen before.