So we decided to try to buy The House. Call it FOO.
My offer was 8% below the listing price.
The seller rejected the offer, and cited the recent sale of a comp (BAR) in the neighborhood, which sold for just over the listing price on FOO.
FOO and BAR are reasonably good comps - same model from the same builder, for basically the same square feet. They both have 40’s era rag wiring. There are some differences, though…
FOO has:
[ul]
[li]3 beds[/li][li]2.5 above grade baths (and a toilet in the basement)[/li][li]0.5 acre lot[/li][li]150 square foot galley kitchen[/li][li]2 car garage[/li][/ul]
BAR has:
[ul]
[li]4 beds[/li][li]3.5 above grade baths[/li][li]0.75 acre lot[/li][li]325 square foot eat in kitchen[/li][li]1 car garage[/li][/ul]
Both FOO and BAR were last purchased at about the same time. FOO sold for 89% of BAR’s price at that time. Neither have had any substantial upgrades since they were last sold.
Being a nice guy, my offer on FOO was 90% of the recent sale price of BAR.
The seller countered with an offer that was less than half a percent below their listing price. Their agent informed my agent that the seller was unlikely to let FOO go for less than 95% of the recent selling price of BAR, and that my offer was verging on insulting.
By the way, FOO has been on the market for three months with no offers that anybody is aware of.
I mean, I realize that we’re talking single digit percentage differences here, but that’s extra cash in hand on my end for contingencies on stuff that the home warranty won’t cover.
Am I off base in thinking this seller is being unrealistic? I mean, a comp is a comp, and given that no two old-ish houses are going to be precisely the same, you adjust for what factors you can. I get that the value of a home is determined by the market, but right now I’m the market, and I think I have a pretty good case that what I’m offering is pretty close to what the house is worth.