Homophobia in Great Debates - Officially endorsed by SDMB moderators?

I have never seen a single NSFW warning on a link that goes to an openly heterosexual-oriented site with advertising, but 5-4-Fighting thought that a warning should be included for a link to a site that went to an openly gay-oriented site with advertising. As was pointed out, this website has “no explicit images or language.” The bigoted attitude that this link needed a special warning was endorsed by a moderator, tomndebb, which comes across to me as an endorsement of homophobia.

Does this message board support a double standard against gay and lesbian themed material? tomndebb, why did you choose to add a comment on this link? Would you add the same comment for a link to a heterosexual-oriented site?

.
Link, please.
.

Dude, that was my post and warning.

I’m gay and fight the good fight every day of my life. In fact, part of the discussion there was about how far we as a society have come in terms of acceptance. Therefore, I thought I’d be considerate of those people in workplaces where the bosses might not understand if they walked by and saw two men standing in intimate juxtaposition to each other, as sometimes happens on a message board called Outsports.

See here.

Wow, my first pitting, sort of.

Aren’t you being just a tad bit oversensitive here?

Here’s the thread in question - I think. Tom hasn’t posted in it. I have, but I made no comment about the links because I didn’t think one was needed.

Well, wouldn’t you be if you only had two-and-a-half inches?

.
I edited out of my first post a similar sentiment. Glad to know I got 5-4’s reasoning right.

If there’s a double standard, it’s in the workplace, where two men snogging on your compy will get you fired faster than a man and a woman. Not here.

It sucks, wah, boo-hoo. Cope, Mary.
.

Where’s your dog in this fight?

Besides the annoying little yapping one always jumping up and down at the baby gate, of course.

Yeah, but the image will appear on the monitor at work.

I didn’t even realize Tomndebb had added a comment.

2.5, am I being pitted? Say I am.

I thought you were the dog in this fight? :stuck_out_tongue:

The SDMB pro-homophobia?!?! You have GOT to be fucking kidding.

Yup. ‘S why I agree with you completely. Now, the link you posted was perfectly worksafe, really (although I think it can be argued that the word “Gay” in the headline will certainly attract more bosses’ attentions to non-work computer use, but that’s neither here nor there). But however abhorrent I find it personally, the double standard remains, and I think we still need to be aware of it. As you clearly are, and as 2.5 needs to get over.
.

Ah, NOW I get it. Tom added this small note to one of 5-4 Fighting’s posts:

That’s it?

Let me quote it again.

This is an endorsement of homophobia, 2.5? You’re an idiot.

Nah- I’m the dog near this fight, wondering WTF is going on.

Look, maybe YOU can’t notice the pro-homophobia behind all the anti-atheism, political apathy, and general disdain for trivial answers to odd questions, but the rest of us sure can. :smiley:

Aw, fuck. I haven’t posted much in the past couple years. Is this guy just trolling for attention? Did I just make him happy by responding?
.

Nice. :smiley:

Uh huh. Probably.

2.5 is an idiot. An idiot that posts shit before his brain fully engages.

There was a time when there was a great deal more “tolerance” shown toward virulent homophobia on these boards, dismissed as just “another opinion.” But due to the constant protests of me and others like me–it was one of the topics referred to when I was called a one-trick pony–it’s now been largely marginalized; on a par with racism, as it should be, rather than religious tolerance, as it was.

So 2.5, historically speaking, this is a fight that has been fought and, I say again largely, won.

Wow, I read that thread earlier and didn’t get ANY of the vibe that the OP apparently got.

Latent anti-anti-homophobia?