Honestly, Honesty

That is freaking awesome.

I suspect with someone as oblivious as brazil84 he might keep posting for months before he figured out no one was responding to him.:smiley:

I think we know next year’s April Fools Day trick.

Everyone to Coventry!

Threads: 662,178, Posts: 16,434,536, Members: 151,560, Active Members: 1

This is particularly funny. The idea that you might try to formulate “rules of debate” is rather like having Ed Wood give a lecture on cinematic technique.

Speaking of movies, maybe his rules of debate are based on killing others in their dreams…

Oh, wait, that is the “Freddy Kruger Effect”…

:stuck_out_tongue:

brazil84, you are the only person I’ve seen that is stupid enough to turn any pit thread they participate in into a pitting of themselves. Every time you attempt to insult the original pit-ee, it ends up building them up higher in everyone else’s estimation.

Truly an accomplishment.

I would say it’s not stupidity but is instead unpopularity. My impression is that little people are always tempted to beat up on the unpopular in an attempt to prove their own standing.

Of course none of this changes the fact that Honesty really is stupid.

Tell ya what. Let’s meet each other half way. I’ll concede that Honesty is really stupid, if you’ll concede that she’s argued rings around you every time you two have disagreed.

Deal?

It wasn’t a claim, dumbfuck. It was pure derision. Go fuck a cactus.

ETA: Aww, shit! I just engaged with it. I feel so dirty.

Lol, fascinating distinction. But anyway, I have no interest in engaging with someone who won’t back up his claims – even if they are labeled as “derision.”

Goodbye.

No thanks. I’ll consider the latter claim if you provide three examples of “arguing rings” with specific quotes and links. Last time I’m asking. I don’t seriously expect you to do so but I feel honor-bound to ask.

Of course the reasons why you are so unpopular are your stupidity, dishonesty, and hypocrisy. Not to mention the juvenility of your repeated trumpeting of your ignore list.

Great. Again you don’t seem to understand that no one is interested in debating you here, because of your flagrant dishonesty and stupidity. All anyone is interested in doing is mocking you.

Once again, a stunning example of your complete lack of self awareness.

So brasil84 is telling everyone that a poster is stupid even after it is clear that that “stupid” poster has demonstrated that he is accurate in a very important point.

And the brasil nut is demanding evidence that he is ignoring before hand in the same thread.

Yep, willful ignorant, and I have to say to the OP that if that is the quality of people that supports it I would question the reasons why this pit thread exists.

brazil84, despite having unambiguously called several people in this thread dishonest, you ignore explicit and repeated requests to back this up. You also claim the following about Honesty:

… but you similarly have not backed this up (and it seems to contradict Honesty’s testimony here). And then you display derision toward those who won’t back up claims against you? This does not seem slightly ironic?

While I agree that we should never miss a chance to reiterate what an assclown brazil84 is, I feel we shouldn’t let that overlook the fact that smiling bandit had the nerve to call another poster out for his/her “ability to write long posts without the slightest similarity to anything remotely resembling reality, instead filling the verbiage with a montage of irrelevancies, simpering emotional engineering, and a complete lack of any objective facts that might be useful to the discussion at hand.” That’s pretty bold coming from a junior Sam Stone.

You think “slight irony” is going to sink in to his head, when he’s completely oblivious to such nuances as “obvious reality” and “blatant falsehoods”?

I’m sure he thinks irony is the opposite of wrinkly.

If I did so, it was either because I inadvertently missed the request or the requester is on my shit list so I did not read his request.

I am happy to attempt to give you some backup – are you seriously skeptical of my accusations? And for which posters?

Are you seriously skeptical that Honesty made such an argument? If so, I will try to dig it up.

If there is somebody who is not on my shit list who asks for backup, I generally try to provide it – provided they tell me they are seriously skeptical of the claim I made. (Some people ask for backup simply as a rhetorical device and not because they really question the claim at issue)

Ah the irony (and the dishonesty).