Indeed, I agree 100%. But I take it you haven’t read this entire thread
To contradict myself, I did just run across this tweet from last night from Ilhan Omar, which suggests that some moderate republicans might not vote for the McCarthy-negotiated rules package:
For the record, I think this is continued fantasy thinking by people who want there to be some sanity in the GOP against all evidence.
There are some newly-elected Republicans coming from heavily Democratic areas, mainly in New York, and they number around 11 – enough to ruin the Howling Monkey Caucus’s plans. It’s not just a fantasy that some moderate Republicans who may wish to hold their seats will prefer to caucus with Dems if the HMC and most of the existing reelected Republicans try to impose too much chaos.
That sounds more like speculation than evidence to me. The only evidence of any kind of actual negotiation with Dems during this debacle that I’ve seen is the tweet I quoted above. And note that Omar was re-tweeting someone else, not saying she herself was involved in any discussions. I’d be delighted to see some more evidence of actual moderate GOP/Dem discussions if you can post it.
Do you think moderate repubs will sink the rules McCarthy negotiated with the Freedom Caucus when the vote comes on Monday?
It would be hilarious if Kevin put up the negotiated rules for a vote, thus fulfilling the promise and then it gets voted down. Not going to happen though.
The moderates were loyal to McCarthy from the beginning and they need to be sold out to blackmailers? They should vote it down and let KM deal with the situation he created.
That was the premise of the opening of this thread. And perceived odds of that went from never ever at best one in hundred thousand to damn maybe only unlikely, then back to fantasy.
I completely agree that those dozenish’s best interests in their districts would have been to avoid too much chaos and Howlers being in control. But if this hostage situation didn’t cross their line it is hard to imagine anything that will.
ETA now seeing mod note but since the specific comment is directly on point of the actual op I am not removing.
Sorry to have spoilered the outcome a few days ago. A bunch of holdouts voting present was the only logical ending given the known facts.
Kevin McCarthy was manically obsessed with becoming Speaker.
Kevin McCarthy does not have a spine.
Those two were both necessary and sufficient. He would give away his later power in trade for the title. Having gotten what they wanted, the holdouts who weren’t complete assholes - call them ssholes - could switch votes and the complete assholes, even the aaassholes, didn’t have to vote for him.
Both sides can now claim victory. Will it hold up? The known facts say that the most logical ending is a continual stream of backstabbing and betrayal, along with more hostage taking. Assholes insane with power. I bet we stop laughing all too soon.
It was directed at you. This thread was for discussion about the election of a House Speaker. Concessions made and what happens past the Speaker race belong in the above-referenced thread.
My mistake. When I read your note and it said “this thread” I thought you meant THIS thread not the referenced thread. I plead dealing with new appliances being dropped off on only 2 cups of coffee while trying to Straight Dope.
This thread having served its purpose as a follow-along for the House Speaker election, and that election having now been accomplished, I’m closing it.