Last time I saw a family of sasquatches (mom, dad, junior), I wasn’t sure of the plural.
So, as an American, I just estimated and said “Three big feet! Which would be a meter!”
A whole troop of bigfootses or yeti, especially if they’re very hairy (they are, aren’t they?), I would call a furlong.
Well, I found a few articles on the giants that the US supposedly fought.
So, what are your arguments that decide that all those people must be wrong? I don’t actually believe that the giants exist, though, but I thought it might be fun to see why you people think they’re wrong?
Because giants don’t exist. There really isn’t anything more to it than that, Those articles are complete bullshit; there’s no need to argue against them any more than you’d need to argue against the rantings of a lunatic.
“Belleview, do you copy? We’re going to need a bigger straight jacket…”
How do you know that? That’s what they also said about the platypus, and look how wrong they were. Just because you say they don’t exist doesn’t mean that they don’t.
There is no reason, in principle, that a population of giants could not have evolved. But that’s the point, it has to be a viable breeding population, it cannot be a couple of isolated individuals that might have hidden in caves. In all seriousness, what is the probability that a population of giant animals has remained undetected to 7.5 billion humans across the globe?
New species of insect and sometimes marine animals are discovered to this day. It should be obvious why that’s different.
ETA:
The adage “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” is a fallacy.
The absence of evidence when the hypothesis strongly predicts that we should have seen evidence is certainly evidence of absence.
Find any evidence that the US tried to “fight” these stories, which presumably means prevent their publication.
And by “evidence” I mean something other than claims by random people on the internet. How about a record that the US ever filed a claim before a court trying to prevent publication or punish the publisher?
What if the giants live for thousands of years at a time, or what if they hibernate for long periods of time? I’ve also seen some people saying that they might have slept in stasis/cryosleep pods and are just beginning to wake up now.
If the US really tried to prevent people from publishing stuff, then they would probably not hold PUBLIC court cases. Thus there would be no information about it anywhere, it would be like one of those fancy “black” aircrafts that they only released to the public a little bit ago.
Jeez, you are credulous to the point of delusional.
Don’t worry, invisible telepathic aliens from the future are waiting in their spaceships hidden under Walmart stores ready to intercept the giants.
And monkeys might fly out of my butt.
This is nonsense, and further highlights that there’s no evidence for anything you’ve said. You might as well have said that the bombs were dropped to kill the rare Afghani leprechauns (or leprekahns as they’re sometimes known) since you have exactly the same amount of evidence for them.
Get some evidence and we can have a discussion. All you have is extremely unlikely hypotheticals and hand waving, which leads mainly to rants and ridicule.
Have you noticed how good the government is at keeping secrets lately? Not very good at all.
Surely Trump would have tweeted something about all of this by now.
Wait… just what is a “covfefe”? :eek:
Stone age giants that sleep in stasis pods. No inherent contradictions there. :dubious:
Organic stasis pods, like chrysalises, not techy-tech stasis pods.
(Still a dumb idea, but slightly less self-contradictory.)
Can’t be - organic stuff was only invented in the late 20th century.
You’re using the wrong definition of organic.
It was a joke, methinks. 
Yes, of course. I was trying to make another joke in response, but it didn’t really work.