I understand how fiber can be good for your gut. Seems obvious that if you eat celery the strings won’t get fully digested, but will reach the intestines and swab it down, like cleaning a hotdog casing with a q-tip. Since polyps and cancers are known to start in buildup in folds and pockets, such cleaning would be healthful.
But some fiber is sold that’s clear, and some is sold as a powder.
To my mind that misses the primary definition of a fiber, that it’s long and stringy.
I think the problem lies in your definition of how fiber works. It doesn’t physically swab anything. A substance that did that would be terribly damaging to the extremely delicate insides of the intestines.
There are two ways that the digestive tract can have a problem: too much water or too little water. Fiber can control both. The fiber particles absorb water to remove it from the intestines. This helps to soften stool and prevent hard, sharp stools from the tearing the rectum and anus. Fiber’s absorbency also brings water from the liquids in the food to the stool to bulk it out and help form regular stools.
What you say sounds very reasonable. But I’ve always been under the impression that that is how fiber works - not necessarily “scrubbing” you out, but helping to clean things. Is it just that it helps maintain stool softness and regularity? Is that the only reason it prevents colon cancer?
I think the original theory, though, was that it help promote more regular elimination of waste, and the idea was that the less time stuff hangs around in your bowels, the better (within reason.)
I’ve been involved in food research for over twenty years, and if I’ve learned anything over that time it’s this: people will believe anything at all about food, provided it’s not true. Mostly because the truth is so much more boring.
Here’s a nice summary from The Bowel Book, by David Ehrlich with George Wolf;
Unfortunately, the book was written when they still thought that fiber was a preventive of colon cancer. That linkage is doubtful.
I suppose you could stretch this in some way to say that fiber cleans things out, but that’s a really bad misunderstanding of what happens, which basically is all about water. Water cleans very nicely, thank you, which is why cher3’s cite says:
That’s also why taking powdered fiber in a glass of water is better than a tablet. Most people won’t drink the full glass of water with the tablet, but just enough to swallow the pill. The water is necessary to work with the fiber.
My motto is: never get medical advice from a newspaper. They jump on every medical journal article as if nothing ever came out before and nothing will ever come out again and so whatever it says is the final word and can be applied to your life, even if it was a study of 7 pregnant vegans with elephantiasis. Anything you’ve ever “heard” is wrong.
Exapno knows of what he speaks! Wise dopers will heed Exapno when he expounds on fiber!
I’ve advocated more fiber for my patients for decades now. Fiber is like a good aerobic workout for the colon. I eat about 60 grams of fiber a day. My colon is my fittest organ!!
I was concentrating on the part of the quote that stated that you need to get your fluids from “beverages and food,” which is quite correct.
The notion that you need to keep a tank of bottled water on your hip is a myth. We are not generally dehydrated. As Snopes points out, though, we do drink enormous amounts of liquids and probably need them.
But liquids are a good thing, especially for those who have bowel troubles. I have no problems recommending lots of fluid intake. It doesn’t have to be in the form of water. But. Huge amounts of caffeinated sugar water have other problems, so I’d still be leery of them even if they don’t dehydrate you.
[QUOTE=Qadgop the Mercotan
I’ve advocated more fiber for my patients for decades now. Fiber is like a good aerobic workout for the colon. I eat about 60 grams of fiber a day. My colon is my fittest organ!![/QUOTE]
<Dr. Kellogg> "My stools are GIGANTIC! With no more odor than a hot biscuit! </Dr. Kellogg>