It’s true the Dem Party is in flux. It almost has to be of the Rep Party is in flux.
I don’t think your categorization is a fair description of the party as a whole.
I’ve never seen that “Acela Corridor” label before. It’s a geographic reference based on a train line. Ok. I’ve previously heard it described as the “Bos-Wash corrodor”, based on the cities involved.
Seem to fit under the Stressed Sideliners under that Pew Research link.
I dispute that college educated skewed more Republican in the last 20 years. I will accept that wealthier voters skewed rep, and usually those are college educated, but that doesn’t mean all college educated skew that wealthy. Middle class is middle class.
As for the “working class” moving Republican, I think that’s an effect of the perception that liberals are “anti-redneck”, and the embracing of the rural working class by the Reps. Those people skewed conservative anyway because of religion and racial identity and perception of fiscal responsibility.
Solidarity of the working class combined with feeling the Dems were shifting away from them drew urban working class.
I think the intent wasn’t county government officials, but Dem party officials. Certainly wouldn’t want elected officials catering to one party.
Is Vance liked enough on his own for that? He’s basically hand-picked by uberrich man Peter Thiel. I suppose they could be holding their nose voting for the R candidate and hoping anyone R would replace him.
Yes, every bit of that. That is the most frightening part of all this, how horrible, terrible, hated he is and yet he’s still somehow running even. That’s sad for our country.
Could be. I want her to stress the idea of how to help Americans without getting to caught up in the weeds, but that could backfire with the “it’s unrealistic, you can’t pay for it, that’ll never work” counter. But she certainly can campaign on joy and policy.