I suspect it’s because in the King and Rook v King ending, the winning player only wins because of Zugzwang. In K and R v K and B, that might not apply–the second player can move his bishop instead of his king.
Consider a Black King on g8, hemmed in by a White Rook on a7. So far so good.
Now put a black bishop on b1 (guarding g6). The White king can’t go to g6. Since he can’t do that (the best the White King can do is to reach f6 or h6), whenever White checks, the Black King can escape to either f7 or h7.
And if White makes a waiting move (e.g. Rc7), Black makes a waiting move (e.g. Bd3).
And here’s where it gets even more interesting (which is why I said ‘unless the attacker can force the defender’s King into a corner square the same colour as the bishop’).
White: King on h6, Rook on b8
Black: King on h8 :eek: , Bishop on g8.
The bishop has been forced to block (as you wanted above), but White has no good move. If he doesn’t unpin the bishop, it’s stalemate. if he does unpin the bishop, it can move away and then return to g8. Draw.
Again this is all true in theory.
The difficulty is reaching the sort of positions where these strong moves are now available!