Glad that there was no repeat. My son had pancreatitis and his wife got annoyed with those questions and with questions along the line of “he’s not really in that much pain, is he?” as if he was looking for drugs.
They x-rayed for gallstones and there weren’t any. So they figured either it was alcohol related or the stone passed. When he had a second attach, they got more invasive and found out that he had two ducts. The story, which I got second hand, is:
1 - before we are born we, as fetuses, have two pancreases, each with its own duct.
2 - typically, the two pancreases and the two ducts migrate and fuse before birth.
3 - in some people, the pancreases fuse, but the ducts do not - one duct empties the front of the pancreas and the other empties the back.
4 - when we are young, most of the flow comes from (IIRC) the front - if the front duct is large enough, a person with two ducts won’t know that they have two.
5 - when we get older, more of the flow comes from the back (or the other way around, if I’m getting them reversed) - if the back duct isn’t big enough to handle the increase: pancreatitis.
The son got a stent to stretch the duct that was too small. After the excitement was over, I told him that I should have suspected that he was a mutant. He replied that it probably wasn’t his genes so much as a hostile uterine environment. That’s my boy.
In his case, once they found the structural anomaly they stopped asking about drinking. It was a nice, physical explanation. They stopped asking if he was exaggerating the pain back when his first blood test results came in. I can’t remember what they measured, but he holds a record for that hospital.
I hope that your husband has no recurrance, but if he does, it’s possible for them to find a reason besides ‘maybe it’s alcohol’ or ‘I don’t know.’