How did telegraphs get where they were going?

Watching Deadwood has brought that question to mind.

Let’s say I was sending a telegraph from New York City to Deadwood. Would I send it to some node along with a “destination” code or something? Then, that node would send it along?

Were there actual nodes, maybe like an airport system today. . .like a telegraph shop in Ohio that had lines coming in from Boston, Philly, New York, and lines going out to Chicago, Deadwood, St. Louis.

Was there some sort of protocol where a guy in NY would send “I’m sending” and wait for an “I’m listening”, much like a TCP handshake today?

I figure that telegraphs were out of date LONG before there was any sort of electronic switching, since telephones still used manual switching for a long time.

If I’m not mistaken, telegraphs were much like the old-style “party line” telephones.

Messages sent along a specific line were received by all stations along the line. Each message was preceded by a sender and receiver code, so stations would ignore messages not meant for them.

I think it’s also true that there was some “handshaking,” in that the sender would send out the destination code and wait for an “OK, I’m listening” reply, but I’m not sure about that.

Just to clarify terminology: Telegraph = device that sends a message; Telegram = the message that was sent.

Telegrams had an address header, which also might contain delivery instruction codes. (wait for reply, reply prepaid, etc) The header would also contain word counts, etc.

Larger citys had telegraph offices with many operators. These served as hubs, much as air travel is organized. One operator would cover each “spoke” line. Between major citys there might be several parallell lines, with an operator on each. Major events, political conventions for example, might have a bank of telegraph operators on hand so reporters could transmit thier storys to thier papers.

When the telegram reached one of these offices, the station chief would decide how to route it to it’s destination. This was done using a series of abbreviations for the intermediate stations, again, just as airports have thier abbreviations for routing luggage. I have no cite, but it is not unlikely that many such abbreviations are carry overs.

Each line was a continuous loop. Each key was series connected, so all the keys had to be closed to allow current to flow. Telegraph keys incorporated a switch which was kept closed unless the operator was sending. Only in point-point lines was the sounder directly driven. In most cases, the line drove a relay, which in turn drove the local sounder.

As another respondant mentioned, a single line could serve many stations.

The sending operator would open the line. If it was a low traffic line, he might next send a large number of dots to get the attention of operators along the line.

The sending operator would then “call” the station he wanted. The other operator would then acknowlage, and the message would be passed.

The recieving operator would remove his own call from the routing list before sending the message on to the next station in line.

People tend to think of morse code as slow. Skilled operators could handle at least 35 wpm, which is about as fast as anyone can write, thus for messages that must be written or typed verbatum, it is about as fast as is usable.

Interesting.

I might need a diagram for some of that, but I get the gist.

Thanks.

Here’s a site with links to way more than most people want to know about telegraphy.
My dad worked in the signal department a railroad. Though it was still in use when he started in the 40s, it was long obsolete when he retired. He brought me home a couple of sounders, and relays and stuff. At one time I had a line running between my bedroom and the neighbor kid’s.

Were there secure telegraph lines for business and government, or was this done in the clear, but in code?

Never heard about any secure lines (though they may have existed), but codes were common. In addition to security issues, codes could shorten messages (and thus the cost of sending it.)

Kevbo says:

From what I understand, a few skilled hams now and many telegraph operaters back in the day could actually send at upwards of 50 wpm and could receive even higher. As you say, some messages had to be typed verbatim and I know a few typists who would say 35 wpm is pretty darn slow.

Anyway, its just a nitpick really, and I’m sure I can dig up cites if anyone really wants me to.

A lot of Hams cheat and use a PC connected to their radio to send/receive Morse.

Pretty odd thing to do if you think about it, using a PC to encode a message into Morse code to broadcast over SW radio to another Ham who’s probably decoding it just the opposite way…