Remember the two yahoos who were picked up last fall on charges of wanting to go on a white supremacist murder rampage of blacks, culminating in a suicide attack on Barack Obama while wearing white tuxedos?
They’ve been indicted by a federal grand jury, but their lawyers are challenging the indictment, on two different grounds: that the racial composition was unbalanced (too many black folks, not enough white folks), and that the individual members of the grand jury were not impartial.
See this recent article: Lawyers for men accused in Obama plot seek more time.
My question: how likley is it that either of these challenges will succeed? Is it very difficult to challenge a grand jury’s decision in the U.S. system? (We no longer have grand juries in Canada, so all I know about them is what I’ve seen Jack McCoy do :dubious: )