In the OP, Scupper said:
Well, either that describes me, or you may hold the theory that I am the world’s strangest troll – and pulled it off in real life long enough to fool SqrlCub, Satan, DrainBead, Smooth Operator, Myndephuquer, and a host of others.
In a subsequent post, Scupper said:
Yeah, his question as redefined was not directed at me, since I attribute it to passing-the-buck for evil deeds to the First Source of All Bucks. I don’t think that God told them to kill all the Amelekite babies, or sent a she-bear to kill 42 children for mocking a bald prophet, nor was (or is) He prejudiced against an assortment of people that many so-called Bible-believing Christians are prejudiced against.
I may owe Scupper an apology for an intemperate answer (and if so, Scupper, you have my humble apologies for unnecessary anger), but there is a major contradiction in the first two posts. Your question, based on the two posts, would be “How do people who believe both that the Christian God is a god of love and that the O.T. is predominantly factual justify the to-us-abhorrent behavior which He is said to have commanded in large parts of the O.T.?” Have I got that right?
Aside from FoG, are there others here who take a mostly-literal view of the OT stories? Zion, you around and qualify for the question as rephrased? CollegeStudent, you still posting? There is one self-described fundamentalist woman who got into a couple of Pit battles (very temperately, I might add) who may have some comments.
Given your clarification, I’ll sit back and observe, unless you want some comments from a liberal Christian with opinions on this (and practically everything).
Hey, Gaudere? Now you know why that company’s search engine is so good at finding things – it’s omniscient!