Yep, they end right before the “money shot” and tell you to go to such and such a site if you want the full video.
A friend told me.
Ive never seen anyone named or “outed” on any amateur porn video on pornhub. While I can’t know, I hazard a guess that I’ve spent more time on that site than you (im careful to couch that as a guess tho ;)) With what is currently “en vogue” in professional porn (amateur porn seems to pick up the trends of it’s professional counterpart) its virtually impossible to identify what is real “revenge porn” and what is “revenge-play” porn. The younger generation, which is the overwhelming share of amateur porn producers, have a distorted relation with sex in general, due to the normalization of porn as they grew into puberty and beyond. An extreme imbalance in gender roles, mysoginy, no concern for the female’s pleasure, extreme and unusual sex acts, etc. These things are run-of-the-mill these days.
And upon thinking for a minute, I suppose it’s possible that I never even see any evidence of these doxxing revenge videos because of the fact that the perpetrators also always, without fail, email the victim to inform them of the devastating news and the victim always manages to contact PH in a very prompt fashion AND ph always immediately removes the video. I can’t rule out that possibility. I am dubious though.
This is because the same company owns Pornhub and a lot of the video producers.
I’m at a loss as to what significance an honest answer, irrespective of whatever it might have otherwise been, you were implying may have had on him other than to satisfactorily answer his question. Care to elucidate, SA?
Is this a challenge ? Are we going to have to have a wank-off ? :mad:
OK, more serious answer : I haven’t either (but then again I’m not really into amateur porn). But they acknowledged it was enough of a problem to address it officially and with as much alacrity as they can - due to the nature of revenge porn and the Streisand Effect, the faster and quieter videos are taken down the less chance they’re copied and re-published by third parties.
Relevant interesting funnyman bit.
I’m not sure about this.
I was the guy that worked at the video store when the Traci Lords thing broke (1985 or 1986 I’d guess without checking). I pulled her films, and I’d guess we had over 50 films with her. We didn’t look for trailers, we didn’t call anyone that had her films, and the FBI didn’t come knocking at our door. There had to be thousands (tens of thousands?) of mom and pop video stores back then. Most had porn. The FBI had neither the ability (or desire I’d think) to go door to door on all of those stores. We pulled them because we received a letter (a snail mail letter) from one of her distributors so there wasn’t this huge rush.
As many may recall, Traci was also in the Penthouse issue that had Miss America nude when Traci was 15. Not sure the FBI was going door to door on those 600,000 copies either.
I meant “does he really want to know the answer to that question.”
And that was a horrible sentence.
Well I reported my first video. Let’s see what, if anything, happens. It’s an amateur video with an obviously underage brace-faced girl backstage somewhere getting, um, Manna from the Gods, several Gods, rained down upon her. At one point towards the end of the video, if you pay close attention you can hear her say (and see her mouth) “I’m 17”, in response to someone unheard off-camera. Immediately you hear a guy saying, “don’t say that”, Seems pretty cut and dry to me. But lets see.
It actually has quite a bit of bite under federal law. Take a look at the Electronic Freedom Foundation’s summary of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.
In the TOS they are explicitly stating that their users, and not their site, are the content providers. That wasn’t toothless. It generally provided pretty robust protection as long as they had some kind of takedown procedure in place. Early this year there was legislation that limited the amount of protection given to hosts under Section 230. It was specifically targeted at sites profiting from human trafficking of sex workers, to include minors.
When i said “toothless” I was referring to impact, or more specifically the lack thereof, on the ultimate outcome, regardless of legal culpability, of broadcasting underage porn on the internet.
Also, I’m curious as to how they go about ascertaining the veracity of the claimed illegality of these reported videos. Certainly not all underage videos feature the girl admitting to her age in the video as the video I reported did.
Missed edit window.
Im wondering what process they have in place for ensuring, to the best of their ability, that they don’t remove perfectly legal material that was reported fraudulently by a person who simply did not like the video or person who uploaded the video (for whatever reasons). Do they require the reporter to submit a form of proof of claim?
Also, if a video featuring an underage girl freaking admitting to her age on camera somehow manages to slip thru the cracks for well over a year (it was listed as being posted in early 2017), I can’t help but to question the overall effectiveness of the user report-based system.
People complain about this happening on every single site on the Internet that allows uploads. The outcome depends on the process, the number of humans the site has investigating these claims, and the possible uproar elsewhere on the net. It depends. There is no one possible answer.
IOW, the answer to this question is exactly like the answer to your original OP.
Those sites are policed by the users fairly well from what I can tell. The vast majority of porn consumers don’t want to look at child porn or genuine non-consensual porn (as opposed to consensual non-consent). So I’m assuming those videos get reported and taken down pretty rapidly.
My old pastor has discussed this kind of thing many times, and I was skeptical because I just wasn’t hearing or reading about it any place else, but now that you mention it, I suspect that he’s probably right. His wife even posted on Facebook that in their city, when OB/GYNs do infertility evaluations, the first question asked is, “Do you engage in penis-in-vagina intercourse, and if so, does he finish inside her?” I was like, wait, what? When I read that, I had a cat sitting on my computer table whose sire and dam were able to figure that out all by themselves, and that’s how I replied. I mean, c’mon, your average 10-year-old should know that this is how babies are made. Another thing he mentioned was the rise in forcible anal rape in “relationships”, and asked about that on a medical board and got the same kind of response, as in, “Where is this happening?”.
I’m pretty sure I even started a few threads here asking if this was really true, and was asked, “What kind of weirdo is your pastor, anyway?” However, if the teenagers and young adults he works with are willing to share details like that with him, like he claims they are? I’m sure glad I’m not a young woman now.
Which seems to be a vague patchwork of partial answers. This question is part of my OP question, not separate from. And I am genuinely interested and curious as to the answers, in no way am I “complaining” about anything. But it seems the answer is simply “it varies”.
Again, to be clear, I’m not talking about genuine ‘child porn’. I think those that are serious about providing it and those seeking it arent going to Pornhub. They know where to be and they know where to look.
I’m talking more about the physically matured but underage therefore illegal porn. Which, I would have to argue at this point, most hetero-male oriented porn-consumers do ostensibly want to look at.
Oh, as long as there exists a gossamer whisper of plausible deniability. I read the comment sections on some of these videos. That’s where the true nature of these dudes shines brightest lol. Yuck. The number of suspicious teen videos Ive come across far outnumber any rape/forced sex videos, of any flavor.
I didn’t say *you *were complaining. I explicitly said that people who have legitimate uploads taken down complain.
My complaint is that reading comprehension is not America’s fastest growing sport.
I’ve noticed that, at any web site selling products that are age sensitive, you simply have to check a box that states you are at least X-amount of years old, and that is supposedly “proof” enough.