But no. 3 and 4 include no. 1 and 2. Perhaps I sjould have phrased it “Only {A/B} is true.”
Those are admirable goals, but they’re based purely on what you value, which may or may not be what God values.
True, but it’s probably pretty close to what God values. No one knows completely what God really wants, even fundamentalist Christians. That’s why there are so many denominations that have so many arguments about what the Bible “really” says. I think that “do unto others” is a good approximation of what the Bible tells you to do.
Jeff
This is not valid logic, unless it’s assumed that A and B can only have two values.
(Even if that is assumed, there are only four possiblities, not five:
A and B are true; A and B are false; A is true, B is false; A is false, B is true.)
One cannot treat A as a variable in some equation, where it can be substituted with equal meaning by “Religion A is true”, “Religion A is theoretically true”, “Part of Religion A is true”, “Fred’s conception of Religion A is true”. These are wholly different types of statements. Any might be a subject for a debate, but the debates would center around largely different issues.
In none of the cases is it likely that many people would claim the statements are entirely true.