I’m not looking for a debate here - please nothing implied about teachers unions, racism, philosophy of education, etc. Maybe in a follow-up post we can go over to GD and try to sort out why these things happen.
My wife and I were listening to John Stoessel on the radio and he said that students in Belgium do better than American students by eighth grade. That got us to thinking about what exactly was being measured here. There are plenty of stats showing that Latino and black students do not do as well, on average, as white students in the US. So if you lump all these students together it leaves some questions unanswered.
Or another way or putting it might be: How does the typical suburban all white school do compared to a foreign school?
Well, if you want an anectdote I took the SATs at age 14 in 1994and got 1390 (with 800 in the verbal) and I was in the top 10% of my school (admittedly, a selective girl’s grammar school), but by no means anywhere near the best performer in exams.
While American third level education is the envy of many European countries, American secondary and primary education…isn’t.
How about this anecdote? One of my friends was an average student in Hong Kong and moved to the US when he was about 13. He’s been #1 in his class ever since.
Not a full answer, but for a start, PISA results are here.
A cursory glance through the charts in the Highlights section shows, for Mathematical Literacy:
[ul]
[li]550: Finland (#1 in OECD)[/li][li]500: OECD Average[/li][li]486: US (24th)[/li][/ul]
And then:
[ul]
[li]512: US Whites (would be 13th if ranked among OECD countries)[/li][li]417: US Blacks (would be 2nd to last if ranked)[/li][/ul]
I’m sure you could get more detail on this by reading through the full report.
Do American kids and European kids take the same standardized test so that a valid comparison may be made? Or do the countries involved each have their own “standardized” test, but the tests themselves cannot be objectively compared?
Uhm…I’ve been in them. As a general rule, go to the richest suburb near any city and you’ll find at least one of them. Maybe “all white” is an exaggeration…let’s say 95%+ white and middle class or wealthy Asian.
The point being there are no mostly white schools that are not in the richest suburbs, so the typical mostly white school will be in the richest suburbs.
Phrasing the question in racial terms was a big mistake, Plan B. Yes, the poor inner-city schools that do an abysmally bad job of educating their students are mostly black, but crouching the issue in racial language is just begging for a debate.
I think that a better version of the question would go something like this:
How would your typical suburban American student, who does not attend a poor inner-city school, and has received a decent education (by American standards) compare to those foreign students that we hear so much about?
In other words, how does a selected elite (not necessarily a small elite, however) of American students compare to the average students in other OECD countries?
I think Anvil Soup’s cite is the closest thing you’ll get to a quantitative answer on this; the answer seems to be, “Better than average American students, but still not remarkably well”.
I am skeptical about such comparisons. for example, comparing the USA average to Finland. Finland is a country of a few million people-its school population is probably less than that of the City of detroit. yes, there are BIG differences between school districts in america. probably a wealthy suburb would compare well to Finland, while a poor, inner city disytrict would not.
A question i have: many european countries track students early-in some countires, only a minority of students persue a college-track carriculum. most of the students attend a vocational track. How does this skew the statistics?
So why does that make you “skeptical” about such comparisons? The comparison simply indicates that the average Finnish student scores better than the average US one, which you don’t seem to be disagreeing with. What is it that you’re skeptical about?
For the abovementioned PISA assessment, which AFAICT provides the only actual numbers considered so far in this comparison, tracking is irrelevant:
Since all 15-year-old students are assessed, the statistics are not skewed by cross-national differences in tracking.