How do wire services work as a business?

I’m wondering about AP, UPI, Reuters, etc.

Don’t they wind up duplicating a lot of the work of other news organizations?

Major newspapers and networks seem to have their own correspondents in place around the world, gathering information and writing stories. What’s to prevent these organizations from banding together and cutting out the wire-service middlemen who seem to do the same thing?
Anyone with knowledge of this business please enlighten me. Thanks! :slight_smile:

The New York Times may have a guy dedicated to covering the affairs of the US Department of Agriculture, but the Gobbler’s Knob Pennysaver-Democrat doesn’t. Wire services provide content to huge numbers of smaller newspapers, local television and radio stations, etc. They also break stories often, allowing all their subscribers (such as major newspapers and national news shows) to syndicate the content until they get their own reporters on the scene.

Wikipedia actually has a pretty interesting article covering the rise and fall of UPI.
This bit on the decline covers some of your questions:

As you said, the wire services like the AP provide stories written by their own staffers, but they also distribute articles written by the member newspapers. So, using your example of the Gobbler’s Knob Pennysaver-Democrat, assuming that it has a first-hand account of the Groundhog Day ceremony, it might send that story to the AP for use by other newspapers.

Others have got it, but just to tie it all together:

A) You pay to be a part of the Associated Press. There’s a subscription fee, with different levels of service. A paper I used to work for paid the fee to get stories, but to get photos and graphics was too expensive, so they did without.

B) You contribute stories to the service. Just because a story says “The Associated Press” under the byline doesn’t mean it was written by an AP correspondent with no other affiliation. Sometimes it was written by someone at another paper, and put out on the wire. The AP actually has desks within some newspapers, specifically to accomplish this task.

So, there’s not much of a risk of papers “banding together to cut out the middleman” because that’s essentially what the AP is anyway. Its Web site says it is a not-for-profit collective owned by its newspaper members.

AP also provides online content to thousands of online news sources, including sites like Yahoo, ESPN, etc.

To amplify what **Garfield **says, a lot of the stories that move over the AP wire are generated by local reporters. An article written by a Washington Post reporter may appear nationwide with an AP byline.

And as for the health of the AP, pick up any local paper and look at the percentage of content is from the wire and how much is from their own staff.

In addition to the stories generated by local reporters for member papers, the AP also employs its own in-house crew of reporters/reviewers/editors etc. to produce material.