Whenever I give the expiration of my credit card, I say, “July twenty-ten,” and I get, “Huh?” or, “Do you mean two-thousand ten?”
I call this year two-thousand nine, but why wouldn’t next year be twenty-ten? Wouldn’t the masses use the one with the least syllables? I’ve been told it should be ‘two-thousand ten’ due to the sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey.
So who’s with me? Are you going with ‘twenty-ten’ or ‘two-thousand ten’? If you’re not going to start with ‘twenty something’ next year, when will you? Twenty-twenty? If people tell me a movie dictates 2010, then I say a TV show can dictate 2020.
I was thinking about this the other day. Starting next year, we can go back to saying “twenty-” because it will no longer be confusing. “Twenty-nine”: confusing, could be “29.” “Twenty-ten”: there is no numerical equivalent.
A strong vote for “twenty-ten,” to be followed by “twenty-eleven” and “twenty-twelve.”
we said nineteen-ten for 1910 (though I guess we said nineteen-oh-nine for 1909) so why not twenty-ten for 2010? I agree that twenty-oh-nine is a bit awkward (along with twenty-oh-nine. Or just twenty-eight/nine), so two-thousand-nine is a good substitute, but we normally break years into first two and last two numbers, and I’m all for starting that up again ASAP
Twenty ten unless trying to be more formal-like for some reason. Saying the superfluous* two thousand ten *is like saying we are going to party like it is nineteen hundrend and ninety nine.
I figure as the year comes in there’ll be a bit of each.
“Two-thousand” certainly came more naturally than Twenty-Oh-Oh or such, and “Two-thousand-one” was the obvious successor. We’ve kept that up through the subsequent decade of similarly-numbered years (did we ever decide to call this the “Oh-Ohs” or the “Naughties”?).
“Two-thousand ten” follows pretty obviously from “Two-thousand nine” in the pattern we’ve been on since the end of the nineties. But eventually “Two-thousand-twenty-seven” is more cumbersome than “Twenty-twenty-seven”, and we’ll switch.
I bet, though, that from the point we switch, we’ll refer back to 2010 as “Twenty-ten”, since that’ll be the pattern we’re used to following, even if back in 2010 we were saying “Two-thousand-ten”.
I like Trocisp’s suggestion myself. Ememex. Ememexeye. Ememex-aye-aye. … Ememeyel … ah, for the simpler times of emceeyemexsee-aye-aye.
I think the comparison with 19xx falls flat. Say Ninety ninety nine stands for ninety nine (hundred) and ninety nine. As it will never be twenty hundred, twenty ten does not make sense to me.