I read somewhere that the British Army was more successful than the others in the 18th/19th century, because they discovered that it was a bad idea to put the latrines next to the source of drinking water.
It is still arguably water mis-management to lavish so much water on the desert.
Maybe we could go back to growing food where water occurs naturally?
When did we ever stop?
not much of it’s really desert and the soil and the weather is right. If you want fresh fruit and veggies all year around and modestly priced stuff, then it needs to be CA.
I remember when fresh fruit and vegees were far more seasonal than they currently are, it’s not a disaster. Rather than destroy ecosystems by diverting all the water to California I’d go back to that.
I get most of my vegetables out of my backyard, which is even more moderately priced than the stuff from California.
There are also other locations that grow vegetables all year round, or taken together would supply them year round. California is not as indispensable as its residents would like to believe. Ya’ll are a convenience, not a necessity.
The rest of us take a look at what happens to the Colorado before it reaches the sea. You’re not getting any more water. You have to learn to live with what you have.
Do you remember when produce cost significantly more than it does today?
Or Mexico
and then we started bringing in fruit from South America during Winter.
I looked into this very recently since I live in drought land. If you want to divert all grey water for recycling, you essentially have to replumb your entire house & have a dual system–one for grey water & one for black water. Additionally, if you plan to use the grey water for watering plants, only organic products can go down the drain–including cleaning products (so no bleach, ammonia, etc).
Now it might be possible to divert shower water to the toilet in the same room & since it’s going to the toilet, there would be no need to worry about what products allow down the drain. However, toilets use approximately 3-7 gallons per flush, but showers uses approx 10 gallons per minute, so you’d have a lot more water than you would likely use for toilet flushing, since a 10 minute shower would produce approx 100 gallons of water.
Very easy to do. The cost of replacing and cleaning the filters makes it impractical. A simple aquarium canister pump with a micron filter will clean over 100 gallons of water an hour. Use some diatomaceous earth and the water will be close to clean enough to drink. It might also clog up from a single bath or shower. Oxidizers could be added to help keep the filter clean and still leave usable cleaning water, but you’d still probably need something the size of a swimming pool filter to avoid frequent cleaning, but the eventual time and cost of replacement will increase.
But California went and hid behind the Rockies. Not our fault. Except for that we would be glad to help…
10 g/min?
That is a heck of a shower!
I assume you meant 10 g/shower. That is more typical.
So get a sufficiently large reserve tank to store greywater in for later use. I don’t know about you, but I flush the toilet more often than I shower.
Just using some of the greywater for flushing is better than using none of it.
Average for a regular shower is 7-10 gallons per minute. A bath tub uses 36-50 gallons. Cite.
Yeah it would depend on your set up. In my house, we shower in the master bedroom which is upstairs. Our plumber could only divert the shower water to the toilet in the same room(without replumbing the whole house). But that toilet gets used only once or twice a day. The one that gets flushed the most is the one downstairs since guests use it. But yes recycling some greywater is better than none, provided you can afford to make the necessary plumbing changes (and in my jurisdiction, permits are required–which is always a hassle).
IMO new building codes should require a dual plumbing system so all greywater can get recycled.
Warning: autoplaying video, click on skip intro.
This washbasin/toilet combo uses the water from the basin for the toilet.