I’ve been waiting for this question to come up from my very first day at the SDMB, since I work at a Municipal Waste Water Treatment Facility. And Phobos beats me to the punch. So I’ll elaborate a little on some of the details.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities (WWTFs) are usually situated in lower lying areas near a convenient ocean or river, so they have a place to discharge the Final Effluent (FE) and to maximize gravity feed to the plant. My WWTF only does primary treatment, (solids removal) and can actually operate for many hours without power, relying on gravity to push the water through the whole process. Of course, all areas of a city cant be at a higher elevation, so the collector mains in low lying areas feed into “Lift Stations” where the wastewater is pumped to a higher level again before continuing down the pipe.
Side note: In a sewer main turds don’t float. They bounce.
Removal is the name of the game, and every WWTF operates under a permit issued by the EPA which specifies physical and chemical parameters that the FE must meet prior to discharge into the receiving water body. The two most critical parameters are Suspended Solids and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). In addition, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform densities, oil and grease, cyanide, disinfectant residual, and dissolved metals are routinely monitored. I personally perform analyses for all of these parameters, except metals.
Sludge is probably a bigger concern than the water itself. Water goes away after it is treated, but you still have to deal with the sludge. There’s many ways to handle it, but the big idea is to de-water it, so it takes up less space. I’ll describe my plant.
It starts out as “wet sludge” which looks like mud and is about the consistency of tomato sauce. Then it becomes thickened into the consistency of spaghetti sauce in another process. Chemicals are added to make it clump together, then water is squeezed out of it on a moving belt press. It looks like damp, dirty cardboard, and is called “cake sludge”. At this point, it is still about 70% moisture by weight and it can be trucked to a landfill or a composting facility.
But that 70% water still weighs a lot and takes up a lot of room. So we burn it in a huge incinerator which reduces the volume by a factor of 10 or 15, and take the ash to the landfill. That way we drive only 1 dumptruck load to the landfill each day instead of 15.
Doctor Jackson wasn’t incorrect when he said the water is purified and sent back to your house. He just skipped over the part about the hydrogeologic cycle. However, the concept of returning FE from a WWTF right back to a drinking water treatment plant isn’t new. There was (is?) a very high profile project in the San Diego area, and another one in Florida I believe, where treated wastewater is discharged directly into a reservoir, where it would eventually be treated and turned into drinking water. I’m pretty sure the San Diego one failed miserably before it ever got off the ground, due to overwhelming opposition from the citizens. No matter how strong and reliable the technology might be, the thought of drinking treated wastewater was too much for the people to handle.
[sub]I won’t even apologize for being so lengthy. I might not get another chance.[/sub]