Well, how do we know? Could it have been fairly common for a death to be classified as “accidental” rather than suicide in order to spare the family? I don’t think we have any *solid and reliable *stats that far back. But it is an interesting question.
Here is a review of a book entitled Suicide in the Middle Ages. Volume I: The Violent against Themselves by Alexander Murray. The piece is notable for its references to Murray’s self-acknowledged difficulties in gathering reliable data. The reviewer himself observes that:
Furthermore:
and finally:
So Mr. Murray devotes a considerable period of his time to researching this subject, the first part of a planned trilogy in fact, and his own conclusions warn of the unreliability of the source data.
For this time period at least, the information just isn’t there.
AKAIK, it’s difficult to get accurate suicide rates even today. It’s a safe bet that a lot of fatal single car accidents are actually suicides, for example, but who can say how many? For past eras where record keeping was spotty, where many records that were kept have been lost, and where suicide had a huge social stigma plus serious legal consequences, you’re going to have a huge GIGO factor, as **Chez Guevara ** has so ably explained.
Perhaps we shouldn’t limit ourselves to Western Europe. The Chinese have kept detailed records (births, deaths, taxes and of course astronomy) going back many hundreds of years; I wonder if they had a suicide taboo that would obscure its true extent? For that matter, the Japanese bushido culture virtually demanded suicide in some circumstances. I wonder how Japanese suicide rates in, say, 1507, would compare to those in 2007 (climbing, unfortunately, from what I’ve read)?