How are the Americas a single continent, but Eurasia two?
I have use for your brain. Well, actually just your hippocampi, but removing just those would raise my costs by 5%. This entire thread was just a ploy to get you to post so I could get a lock on your position. Don’t bother running; the tracer’s already been implanted and the nanites have been launched.
Both Americas put together look like one continent.
Europe, Asia and Africa together is just too big and shapeless.
I’m not saying I’m an expert on this.
From the Wikipedia article on continents:
[
[QUOTE=what did I just say]
The terms Oceania or Australasia are sometimes substituted for Australia to denote a continent encompassing the Australian mainland and various islands of the Pacific Ocean not part of other continents. For example, the Atlas of Canada names Oceania,[13] as does the model taught in Italy, Greece[19] and in Latin America, Spain and Portugal.
[/QUOTE]
](Continent - Wikipedia)
Six. Cultural differences don’t split land masses into two. Greenland and New Zealand are the Plutos of land masses, eliminated for continenthood by internationally-agreed standards determined arbitrarily by me.
Greenland is eliminated from continent-hood because it is physiographically part of North America; that is, the land composing it is part of the North American Plate, just as Great Britain is part of the Eurasian Plate.
Incidentally, South America is not part of the North American Plate, and India is not part of the Eurasian Plate. SA’s connection to NA and India’s to the rest of Asia is more tenuous than it appears.
Somebody call **Sunspace **back.
I thought about including that as an option but it’s always best to leave a viable option out of polls.
I voted for seven and six (Eurasia) because while there are conventionally seven continents, there isn’t any geographical reason for Europe and Asia to be separate continents (they are part of the same plate). Actually, if you used that as a definition of continents, the Middle East would be a continent, as would the Philippines and the Caribbean islands south of Cuba, and part of California wouldn’t be part of North America (Cecil covered this before).
I voted 7, because traditionally Europe and Asia were two continents and Asia is too big by itself already anyway. Greenland only looks big because of projections on anything but a oblate spheroid globe. <Hence the trap.> I’m okay considering Oceania to include Australia and New Zealand plus other small islands on that plate. Speaking of plates, no pie for me, white chocolate is an abomination to me and all right thinking peoples. Also, anything half the size of Connecticut is not going to be a continent, even if Pluto was still a planet. And what about sunspace’s brain?
So far as Zoey Deschanel-model comfortbots, I’ll be in my bunk.
I said comfortbots, not hookerbots. Hookerbots have sex with you; comfortbots do not. Comfortbots bring you meals when you’re hungry, massage your back and feet when you’re achy, sing sweet songs to you to cheer you up when you’re sad, and brutally murder your enemies with their bare hands when you need your enemies brutally murdered by hand.
You guys are all arguing past the point. What does it matter, honestly, that water happens to arbitrarily cover some land and not other? The real continent count should be the tectonic plates! There are 15 major tecnotic plates, and I say each one should be called a continent.
But let’s compromise, shall we? Let’s toss out all the tiny ones, and the ones that are mostly/completely covered with water.
Thus, a proper list of continents gives us:
North America (actually contains a chunk of Asia)
South America
Antarctica
Africa
Arabia (Mostly Saudi Arabia and adjoining countries)
India (not just the country, some surrounding stuff too)
Eurasia
Australia (contains most of New Zealand)
(POSSIBLY) Caribbean Plate [mostly underwater]
The other part of New Zealand is on the Pacific Plate which is all islands and water… so let’s give it its own continent too.
:: glub ::
:: splutter ::
Why is it always tentacles?!!
:: shudder :: ahem
Sorry about that. I’m happy to report that both I and my brain are fine.
Re: Oceania… I was always under the impression that Oceania was a catchall for “everything that isn’t already on another continent, and is therefore a mid-oceanic island”, rather than being a defined area itself. Am I wrong?