Whenever people are polled on what the worst pain is they’ve experienced migraines always score highly, and cluster headaches (among the population unfortunate enough to experience them) higher still.
So even if expectations can make the experience of pain worse, it’s pretty clear that even with no expectation at all “immediate pain” in itself can be agonizing.
I don’t disagree with you (not your new point, anyway). I’m asking what your point is wrt the OP.
Earlier you were saying that discomfort is largely about future expectations, and gave the example of a child happily playing in the cold. The implication being that animals are like the child and should be happy. But this reasoning doesn’t stand up to scrutiny, and you’ve retreated from this position. Fine.
Now your point seems to basically be that animals’ experiences/sensations are different. But I don’t think anyone would ever have doubted that.
So if there is something more specific you are saying about animals’ experience of the cold, what is it?
I have not been able to find definitive data on this and I do not know if I would trust it if I did because I believe there is, even among scientists, a very strong, built in, optimism prejudice. My personal suspicion is that animals in extremely cold or hot environments are, on the one hand, comparatively warmer or cooler than a human would be by virtue of their coats; but, on the other hand, that they nonetheless suffer unimaginably throughout such conditions and are very much aware of them. They have no choice. They must spend their time surviving and the top two things that means is avoiding predators and finding food. But they know it hurts. I believe if they had human consciousness and human concepts they might very well decide to take their own lives: but that entails a very developed set of concepts that they lack. For example, I very much believe they lack our concept of “otherwise”- that things could be any different from how they are. I believe at any given moment things to them are just how they are: at this moment in existence my leg breaks; at this moment in existence I get eaten, etc. Whatever happens at any given moment is the only thing that could happen and even this portrayal is certainly much too anthropomorphic. But this also raises the question of just what is suffering like for the species and I do not know if it is possible to answer that except by futile efforts of inference and supposition by means of tests devised by humans. Most humans, I think, will strongly disagree with me for a wide variety of reasons, but I believe the life of most species, viewed in human terms, are boring, arduous, frightful, tense, ugly, harrowing, repetitive and meaningless. I do not even see how it can be doubted. What is very much in doubt is how the species perceive and comprehend the nature of their own existences