Hi all,
I’m trying awfully hard not to come across as coy here, but given the public nature of the forum, it really wouldn’t be prudent to delve into specifics. I sincerely hope you understand and forgive my reticence.
Not that there are any specifics yet. Part of my reason for posting so early was to try and get some general sense of things before moving forward. I completely understand (and expected) the speculative nature and vast amount of variables involved, but every little bit of insight helps.
Here’s the thing. It’s not the World Bank, nor is there any connection to the WB, but it (and USAID) serves as an example because the WB is an aid agency of similar size and reach.
The project is about as ill defined as can be. It’s a completely new issue. Well, not new per se, but new in the sense that everyone already knows that poor people have crappy shoelaces. But now this agency wants to do something about it–raise awareness, change legislation, etc. and wants to do so on a global scale. But they question the traditional institutional methods of doing so (i.e., “Hey look, a problem. Let’s write a 500 page report!” “No wait, let’s write a whole series of them!” and so on), and are considering bringing us in to oversee, coordinate, and advise from the initial stages through… through… all I know is the words “year long” were bandied about. And that’s about all I know at this point.
The other thing I know is how we (Mrs. Dvl and I work as a team) found ourselves in this position. A project we were working on for an unrelated agency caught someone’s attention. This person wanted us to come in for a meeting to talk about said project. Then that person’s boss got involved. Then that person’s boss, and so on up the food chain until we found ourselves in Grand Poobah Central. After about forty minutes or so, GP changed the subject, and we spent the next couple of hours talking about the new project. In essence, we outbid Booz Allen in Right Place/Time.
So, hence the OP. We’re not due to meet again for another few weeks, but the prep work/research is in full gear. We’re certainly not looking to gouge them; after all we chose long ago to focus our efforts in the nonprofit sector. Nor do we have the expectation of parity with BA’s fee structure (they’re not talking with us because we’re cheap, but we certainly don’t have delusions of grandeur). However, our typical per diem rates haven’t taken into account more than a five- or six-month projects or long-term full-time dedication to one client. And, while our skills and capabilities are not in doubt, we haven’t submitted a proposal for something at this overall level and scope.
So, as we move forward and head into the next meeting, we’re looking to gather as much insight and as many perceptions as possible–we certainly don’t want to be caught off guard.
Thanks,
Rhythm
(Who is desperately trying to avoid any premature chicken-counting, but has to be prepared)