Both CBC and CTV Ottawa have had the same weather person for like 30 years. I’m not kidding.
I get my weather from the internet. I used to have to watch these guys, but I don’t any more, and why would anyone wait for the evening news when you have the weather at your fingertips?
What do these guys get paid, and why?
I have a feeling they make more money by being the goofy sidekick at charity events.
I’m pretty sure weather is still the big driver of local news ratings. Viewership is on the decline, so more and more people are deciding it’s not important, but the people who do watch still care about the weather report.
The Ottawa-Gatineau market isn’t huge (I found a list of North American TV markets that places it between Providence and Fresno) so I wouldn’t expect that they get paid massively, although maybe seniority counts for something.
Weather people, and TV reporters in general, are like actors. A small number of them make a large amount of money, but the vast majority make very little. Like Wal-Mart type wages.
Yes, is the presenter there as a pretty face (remember that Sarah Palin once did this job) or as an expert meteorologist (as on the BBC)? The latter will have considerable input to the broadcast; the former none.
They’re all billed as meteorologists, and at one point that may have been true.
But seriously, I could look at the internet now for a minute and give an equally impressive TV performance. These people are no longer prognosticators; they’re actors.
In most markets, the TV weather presenter is not a full-time position. The person often is employed elsewhere, and comes in a few hours before airtime to prepare the on-camera presentation. Nowadays, TV weather people are almost always degree meteorologists, and may be employed in public or private forecasting. Often, the staff meteorologist at the local airport.
Although, there are quite a few TV stations that have, over the years, hyped weather into something that people really need to know about, and have a long-standing tradition of a high-profile personality associated with the weather. But even them, the weather person will not make much more than a staff news reporter, and certainly less than the news anchor. When I was a news anchor, I lived in a one-room apartment and drove a ten year old car. It doesn’t take very long for a cute girl to learn to write temperatures on a map, but in the current paradigm, even a staff beat reporter needs a degree in journalism to get his resume looked at. And universities are full of young women with big hair and sparkly eyes who want to grow up to be a weathergirl or news anchorette.
Here where I live, the weatherman is a proper meteorologist, been here forever, and probably the best recognized TV personality in town. He’s fuill-time staffer, on the air at 6 and 11, and 24 hours on the OTA channel devoted to infotraqsh and exercise equipment ads. But I doubt if he makes any more money than any of his fellow employees who wear a necktie to work.
They make less than one would expect, usually less than 50K in a mid-sized market, unless they are a chief meteorologist, and that is with a degree, and often with a certification. The same goes for most people that are not in anchor positions, such as field reporters, and for the majority of newspaper journalists, radio personalities, and digital reporters (I’ve been lucky enough to work with them all).
Most of them understand going in that they are not going to make a fortune doing this, they just want to be in the business, and generally really enjoy what they do. Most of the time the path to more money is relocation to a bigger market, which also means starting over in regards to community relations. Many of those community relations events are not paid either, but personalities are expected to attend them because they help drive eyes and ears to that station/ paper/ website. the better ratings and following you have, the more power that you have when it comes time for contract negotiations.
No, not real meteorologists. I’d say that about 25% of TV weatherpeople are real meteorologists. Probably less. Read their biographies. If their degree is from Mississippi State, they’re not real meteorologists. That’s an online degree in “Broadcast Meteorology” which is intended for TV people. It isn’t 50% of what a real meteorologist studies.
In the southern Midwest, where tornados are prevalent during the months of April through June [Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa], people rely heavily on their local weather to keep them informed about deadly storms. I would expect that almost all of the local stations have full fledged meteorologist on staff and they heavily invest in the latest radar technology. For true weather nuts, this is the big time.
This link says that the local, long time Philadelphia weather caster makes $400,000 per year. I think she does some other shows for the local channel, though.
If you ask my dad they all make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year and they’re not making any sort of scientific prediction they are just making it up and have no idea when it’s going to rain and it’s a conspiracy to ruin his goddamn life.
I suspect it has more to do with those women finally having a job that provides health/maternity benefits and halfway livable income than whatever porn fantasy you might be imagining.