How much energy is expended to physically flip a light switch?

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/222/to-save-energy-should-you-turn-lights-off-or-leave-them-on/

Coincidentally, the point about saving money/energy by turning off lights came up in conversation a couple weeks ago. Going by the general rule of thumb, I said it wasn’t worth it if the room will be used in the next fifteen minutes or so. I was “one-upped” when a passing customer claimed the energy expended by physically flipping the switch was greater than the energy saved. Of course, the customer was dead wrong, but at just that moment all the phones started ringing and a group of people walked in the front door. Given the situation on the ground we let it go with a “yeah, maybe” and “who knows”.

Reading the column reminded me of that episode. Now I am wondering how wrong the customer was. I will frame the question in the context of Cecil’s column. How much energy is spent by physically flipping a light switch off and on before and after one’s daily shower?

I thought about writing to Cecil/the SDSAB, but then I remembered that the Master has retired and the SDSAB is probably out of commission, too. So here I endeavor to answer my own question.


With my elbows in, my whole arm slack and forming an angle just over 90 degrees, and my hand resting on a scale, the “weight” (mass) reads about 1 kg.

The length from my wrist to elbow is about 33 cm. Using my elbow as the centerpoint, my hand makes an arc of about 90 degrees when I quickly raise it to flip a switch. In practice I use my upper arm but that involves a tiny bit more physics that I don’t feel like doing right now.

With a radius of 33cm the perimeter of the resulting circle is 66pi cm. Therefore the arc of 90 degrees has a length of 16.5pi cm, which I’m rounding to .5 m.

It takes me somewhere between half a second and three-quarters of a second to raise my hand up to the light switch. I will use .5 s for simplicity’s sake.

Moving a distance of .5 m in .5 s (from a state of rest) is equivalent to moving .5 m at constant acceleration of 1 m/s^2 (from a state of rest).

Acceleration of 1 kg at the rate of 1 m/s^2 is equivalent to 1 N of force; 1 N of force acting on an object through a distance of 0.5 m is equal to 0.5 J of work (1 Joule = 1 Newton x 1 metre). Therefore flipping a light switch, by lifting my one kilogram arm a distance of half a metre over half a second, takes half a joule of energy. Considering that the light must be switched twice (once before entering the shower, and once after exiting), this amounts to one extra joule per day.

The ratio between joules and kilowatt hours is 360,000,000 to 1. Therefore, the energy spent moving one’s arm to toggle of the bathroom lights twice a day amounts to 0.00000101389999999… kilowatt hours annually. Put another way, one joule per day is approximately 0.872 Calories per annum, or approximately one celery stick’s worth of energy per eighteen years. You spend about 20 times as much energy after drinking a 16oz glass of ice water (17.5 Calories) than you by flipping the light switch twice a day for a year.

~Max

“How much energy is expended to physically flip a light switch?”

If it means getting up off the couch when I DON’T need a beer, it takes all the energy in the world.

To put 1 joule in context in another way, if you’ve got super-efficient lights that use only ten watts, then a joule is the amount of energy they consume in a tenth of a second. I think it’s safe to say that if you’re only going to be leaving the lights off for a fraction of a second, then yeah, go ahead and leave them on.

I’m old enough to remember snappy switches before mercury switches, and paired push-button switches before snappy switches. (Actually, the last couple of years, I’ve been installing Lutron switches that work with Apple HomeKit.)

I know of a few places that still use the original paired push-buttons, and you can even buy new ones to install in a new house, if you want that retro look.

I’m not sure what you mean by “snappy switches”, though.

I’m pretty sure he just means the older mechanical switches that seemed to (or did) snap into place when you moved them a bit more than halfway. I’m pretty sure there was a spring that held them in either the up or down position and resisted your moving the switch a little bit.

That’s about. Simple switches are too prone to arcing, so the spring mechanism made sure that contact was made or broken sharply, no matter how slowly your finger moved.

Mine do this now…

~Max

Yeah, aside from dimmer switches, every household switch I’ve seen (er, felt) has had that snappy behavior.

FWIW, there are two kinds of snappy switches: Rocker Switches and Toggle Switches. The toggle switch is the older technology, and it is more snappy. The Rocker Switch is the more recent technology, and is less snappy. But both are/were snappy, and snap when you move the switch from one position to the other.

Where I live, they changed over from toggle to rocker in the 1970’s.

I’m not sure about today (since 1984 I’ve been living in a house built in the 20s), but in the mid-50s, the standard new wall switch involved a glass bulb with a bead of mercury, designed to tumble on or off the leads. The action of the switch lever was completely smooth.

If we are going to get really pedantic, you should also consider inrush current, and the slightly diminished life of the bulb from cycling. Whatever amount of energy required to make the light bulb, deliver it to the store and then to your home, plus the energy required to change the bulb and dispose of the old one, multiplied by the percentage of lifespan reduction caused by the extra cycle.

All of this may add a fee more milliseconds to the milliseconds that you can leave the light on before it makes sense to switch it off.

This.

Manually-operated power switches are designed (or at least should be designed) so the contacts close (and separate) very quickly. This is to minimize the duration of the arc, and thus minimize damage to the contact surfaces. This is especially important on DC switches.

When you begin to flip the switch handle, the contacts are not moving. Instead, you are supplying energy to a spring. More and more energy is stored in the spring as you move the handle more and more.

As you continue to move the handle, the “break-point” will eventually be reached. At the break-point, the energy from the spring is quickly released into a mechanism that is designed to close (or separate) the contacts very quickly. The mechanism works similar to the trigger on some rifles.

A joule is one watt second. A KWH is 1000 watts for 3600 seconds = 3,600,000 joules.

Right you are. Let me revise that paragraph:
The ratio between joules and kilowatt hours is 3,600,000 to 1. Therefore, the energy spent moving one’s arm to toggle of the bathroom lights twice a day amounts to 0.0001013888… kilowatt hours annually. Put another way, one joule per day is approximately 87 Calories per annum, or one hundred grams of boiled potato, or just over one and a half Oreo® cookies.

~Max