I realized today that I listen to at least 50% live work. Not nearly a conscious choice. I frequently enjoy live cuts much more than studio cuts of the same song. Many performers or bands are all about variations and flexing the muscles of their songs.
Do you listen to live recorded tracks? How much of what you’re listening to on a regular basis ( cell phone, portable media, iPod, etc ) is live opposed to studio and why?
While I have a lot of live recordings, I don’t really listen to them that much. When I do listen to them, it’s usually because of one specific song that has an unusual solo, or because the mix of songs (yes, I’m an older guy who doesn’t use playlists that much) is a good one. In some cases, I listen because I was at that particular performance or at a similar one on the tour.
Overall, it’s hard to get the same sound quality from a live performance. I miss the overdubbed parts that often don’t make it through to a live performance and I don’t get a big rush from simply knowing that the performer is “pulling it off” live on stage.
I said 20% because it was the lowest. I think it’s less than that. I don’t own any recordings anymore, and listen to live stream (Pandora) or SiriusXM.
Yeah, in general (with some exceptions), live recordings offer the “worst of both worlds” between studio recordings and attending a live performance, IMHO.
I will say it has improved dramatically since the early days of my collection (1970s) The live performance albums had so much crowd noise it was hard to enjoy the music.
I went 20 but the reality is more like 5% of what I own and 10-12% of what I listen to. Some depends on the group/performer and there are albums that are mixed live/studio pressings especially in some of the “best of” types.
With the exception of the Kinks and some of the more highly-produced megabands, most of the live tracks put out by the bands I prefer to listen to are really poor recording quality. I do enjoy watching the bands perform live just to get a feel for how they interacted with the audience and each other, but for listening pleasure or background noise I prefer studio. A singular exception is The Cramps. My god their live performances were amazing in every way.
I’m not a huge fan of jazz, but given its spontaneity it seems like it would be hard to listen to studio performances where the musicians aren’t able to respond to the audience. Similarly, it doesn’t get much better than a good blues man hamming it up for the crowd.