Yeah, the Honorable Reginald Houseman takes quite a beating in those books, doesn’t he?
[QUOTE=MaxTheVool]
This is obviously a tangent, but (spoilers for the Honor Harrington series coming up) I thought it was hilariously preposterously beyond ridiculous that the following sequence of events could possibly come to pass:
(1) The Star Kingdom of Manticore (which is the “good guys”, and, despite being a monarchy, is the political analog of the US) (at least as far as liberals and conservatives are concerned) has long been in a cold war with the People’s Republic of Haven (which is evil and facist and expansionist with traces of French revolution and communism)
(2) The cold war becomes a shooting war
(3) There is much fighting back and forth. Zillions of people are killed
(4) Finally, due to awesome technology and bold military leadership, the SKoM gains the upper hand, and is charging, unopposed, across the galaxy, and will clearly soon capture Haven itself, finally ending the war.
(5) The prime minister of SKoM is assassinated (in an attempt which was aimed at various members of the royal family, as I recall). In wartime.
(6) Due to the way the government works, the person who now takes over as prime minister is a “liberal”
(7) The new liberal prime minister (and bear in mind that the government is basically parliamentary, but with popular election, so politicians have to respect the will of the people), who took office in the middle of war time, a war against a hated foe, a war where all of a sudden total military victory looks imminent; who took office due to the dastardly assassination of his predecessor (granted, an assassination which was not PROVEN to be due to the enemy, but still…); this liberal prime minister decides to… STOP THE WAR! And offer a peace treaty! And give the enemy time to rearm!
I mean, COME ON! It’s one thing to say that liberals are pacifists who are too hesitant to use military force and too willing to overlook the evil deeds done by others (although in the post-Iraq mindset that seems pretty silly). It’s another to say that anything but a crazy fringe of liberals are so anti-war that they would stop a nearly-won war just out of political spite, AND that the populous would somehow support them. Sheee-eesh.
[/QUOTE]
Steps 6 & 7 are incorrect.
The existing govt. consisting of the Crown Loyalists and Centrists basically dissolved when the PM was assassinated. The new govt. was a bastard coalition between the Conservatives, the Liberals, and the Progressives. They really, really hated each other, but they hated the thought of being powerless for the next 20 years even more. True, the Manty govt. was a democracy, but the PM was elected by the House of Lords (who did not stand for general election), not Commons. The new PM was Baron High Ridge, the head of the Conservatives, whose basic position was that all political power should rest with the nobility, and the peasants should know their place. It was never their intention to make peace with the Peeps. Their original intention was to prolong the war just enough to make it look like the Cons, Libs, & Progs won it, not the CLs & Centrists. Once Thiesman killed St. Just, and a new Haven govt. was formed, the Manty govt. were purposely avoiding signing a final peace treaty just so they could maintain their wartime powers longer. They were supremely confident that their tech advantage would be able to handle anything that Haven could throw at them, to their sorrow. But it wasn’t just the Libs running the show at that point, in fact, I’d say the Cons. had more input into their policies.