October 17, 2016
My question is about the physics of how a kickstand works and how to make mine better.
Three months ago I acquired a 1988 Honda GoldWing, which is among the heaviest of motorcycles. The kickstand is deployed in the usual way. You use your left foot to swing it down and forward till it’s fully extended then you let the weight of the bike lean left against it and dismount. It’s exactly how the kickstand on a bicycle works, except that you can deploy the kickstand on a bicycle after you’ve dismounted whereas with an 800-pound motorcycle you must deploy it first.
The problem is that if the GoldWing is parked even slightly nose-down when you dismount, the kickstand collapses. If the front tire is lower than the rear tire by only a degree or two, when you let gravity have its way it tries to make the bike move down, which is forward, which is what causes the kickstand to swing backward relative to the bike, which means it is no longer supports the weight of the bike, which is why it crashes forward (and of course to the left, not the right), which is embarrassing, inconvenient, and dangerous. I promise.
Whether this is a design defect or not, I need to fix it but I don’t know how. Google searches I’ve tried provide no help, so I’m turning to you experts.
To address the physics, please imagine facing the left side of the bike as it’s parked on flat, level ground. If the kickstand is horizontal, i.e., undeployed, let’s call that 90 degrees. If it’s swung out to where it’s dead vertical (plumb) we’ll call that 180 degrees. Needless to say, any kickstand’s angle relative to level should be more than 180 degrees, that is, it should prevent the bike from falling forward by gravity if the front tire is lower than the rear tire. The problem is that it takes only a really small amount of nose-down attitude to collapse the kickstand on my motorcycle. Said another way, I think the angle of the fully deployed kickstand is not enough more than 180 degrees.
I’m not sure that’s the problem, I just can’t think of any other explanation. If you can, please tell.
What repair or other improvement can you suggest that would most easily and properly solve this problem?
As I see it, and I know almost nothing about physics, one solution is to effect some sort of improvement so that the pad of the kickstand lands more forward than it does now. If the kickstand’s current angle is 185 degrees, it should be changed to maybe 190. If I’ve got that right, how would you do it? The best solution I thought of is to sever the kickstand halfway along its length and weld the bottom half back onto the top half at an angle that makes the pad rest on the ground an inch or two forward of where it rests now. Does this make sense from a purely physics viewpoint or is there a better way? Is there a formula in physics that tells how much resistance to forward movement there is relative to how far forward the pad is from plumb?
I know I don’t want to change the angle at which the bike leans left, when viewed from behind, when it’s normally parked. If it leaned any more to the right it would be at risk of tipping over to the right, where there’s no kickstand. Also, when someone climbs into the passenger seat, it’s important that that adding and shifting of weight not allow the bike to tip past plumb. But if it leaned much more to the left it would be too heavy to raise back to plumb after sitting on it. Whatever change is effected shouldn’t change the bike’s left to right tipping angle when it’s parked.
Here again, a physics question: What difference would it make to catastrophic kickstand failure if when I parked it I first turned the front wheel all the way to one side or the other?
Finally, is there any benefit to leaving the bike in first gear rather than neutral to help prevent the kickstand from giving way? My GoldWing is 1,500 ccs spread out among six cylinders.
This is a lot of questions, and any potential answers or other thoughts you care to offer about kickstand physics will be read and appreciated.