Nope, what you demonstrated here is that you have even codified and put in your own bibliography the steps you do on how to move the goal posts.
Just another form of “raising the bar” or “Special pleading”, it is a form of a fallacious argument.
Nope, what you demonstrated here is that you have even codified and put in your own bibliography the steps you do on how to move the goal posts.
Just another form of “raising the bar” or “Special pleading”, it is a form of a fallacious argument.
‘they built it to prove they could build it’ ???
thats what youve got?
:rolleyes:
Yeah, sure, a Ben Ben stone.
Maybe if you squint, turned it upside down, looked at it funny and during an eclipse it would look like that.
It looked more plausible when Biblioteca Pleyades posted an article claiming that the Ben Ben stone actually looked like an Apollo capsule and that was evidence of the ancient aliens.
I’m not sure you understand it. Your interpretation is, after all (and no matter what you consider it), at most, just another interpretation – and to me, it just sounds like a guess. Your attempting to interpret a translation of a transcription of an ancient text. There’s no “literal” reading of such a document – it’s always interpretation.
I never really thought about this one way or the other, but now I’m pretty convinced they used ramps.
Of course, this actually describes your nonsense quite well:
The problem is that most people realize just how unsupported cladking’s imagined beliefs really are. If you ask for support not once can he even cite the relevant evidence that purportedly explains his belief; instead he imagines that he is the only human in history to “correctly” read one specific ancient document that he believes sets ancient Egyptians apart from all other humans in having no religious beliefs and a science for which there is no evidence.
(I do wish, however that you would stop libeling whoever it is that you call “Egyptologists” with your rampant claims that they “say” this or “believe” that when you cannot point to a single “Egyptologist” who has actually said any of the things you ascribe to them. While I can feel some sympathy for you over your nonsense beliefs, your libel of the unnamed (and probably imaginary) “Egyptologists” moves you into the realm of Conspiracy Theorist which is a category of person who not only does not deserve compassion, but invites scorn.)
That’s the reason we went to the moon.
Oooooh, I gotta ask. Not because I doubt you, but because it has to be a helluva story: Cite?
So it’s ridiculous to think of the pyramid-builders spending the time and resources to build giant memorials for dead kings, but it’s not ridiculous to think they spent the time and resources to build giant memorials to just how pimpin’ their civilization was?
and the reason we do many things - but its usually stated as such.
ramps and geysers!
…
Is building cathedrals ridiculous, cladking?
I am supremely confident the board will be happy to comp you.
74westy - Not sure I understand your post. I was pointing out cladking’s inconsistency in saying that it is ludicrous to imagine the pyramid-builders doing all that work for a tomb, then claiming that they did it as a monument “to the ingenuity and industriousness of nature/ human beings.”
Both are, IMO, perfectly plausible reasons for building the pyramids - humans have done stranger things for odder reasons; but cladking seems to think that one is ridiculous and the other not.
It’s a parody of JFK’s quote about going to the moon. In other words, just a joke.
It would be if you tried to squirt them into place.
Today’s thread winner.
**Telemark **is right. I went for a cheap laugh but I didn’t have any problem with your post (aside from it being more thoughtful than mine.)