Tell me anything at all you think you know and I can find something in their own writing that contradicts it.
I just looked in their writing and found “geysers? who suggested we use geysers? thats dumb.”
Prove I didn’t.
What about Eye of Horus is unknown?
The ancient texts say that Horus’ eyes were the Sun and the Moon. The glyph often represents the Sun.
Why is it drawn that way? Horus had a falcon’s head. The lines around the eye of Horus represent markings around a falcon’s eye.
A legend tells of the sun/ eye being broken into pieces, and then reassembled. Following this, the Egyptians used parts of the symbol to represent fractional values.
All this is known. What about it do you think puzzles the Egyptologists?
And I’ll say again that I’m not interested in what you believe. I want to see some objective evidence that all ancient humans spoke the same language, that the language corresponded directly to reality, that some “Tower of Babel” event fractured this language, that the vocabulary stayed identical but the grammar changed overnight to such an extent as to render the older unreadable - all claims that you have made in this thread, and none of which you have been able to back up.
That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
We should, but every time the King makes some bullshit claim about mystical ancient language, I’m going to call him on it. I don’t know enough about engineering or physics or chemistry to challenge him there; besides, you and Human Action and GIGObuster have those pretty well covered. I don’t know a whole lot more about language, either, but enough to see that I know more than the King. And I’m not going to let his linguistic woo pass unchallenged.
I know. I was just pointing out the evidence for that fact.
Your turn.
Why don’t you tell us about the eye of Horus then.
I would especially like to know what exactly the connection is with Wadjet, Hathor, and Bes.
869a All day I’ve faced
869b The barren waste
869c Without the taste
870 Of water
871a Cool, clear water
871b (Water!)
“The eye of horus” is the colloquial term for the opening through which the water sprayed. “Iusaas” is the scientific term. A feminine form of the 'phallus of atum" would be the vulgar term but I don’t recall it actually appearing anywhere (perhaps a grammatical rule prevented its usage). Iusaas is the “consort of atum” who was the first god who created himself. The eye of horus was simply the hole through the primeval mound and the ben ben atop it through which nun (natural phenomenon of the waters of the abyss) saw zep tepi and the birth of shu (up) and tefnut (down). The wadjet was a specific type of serpent (a fluidic flow from a natural source represented by a cobra) which represented protection for the king.
Horus (the elder) sprang from between the thighs of the ennead at zep tepi and was the son of atum. Horus (the younger) was the stone of which horus the elder (phenomenon of the land of rainbows) was composed. Horus the younger was probably should be thought of as a colloquial term as well and “tayet” (the quarry) as the scientific term.
Hathor literally sprang from the eye of horus and was the beauty (and power) of the inundation as manifested by set (phenomenon of physical water). Hathor was at ground level and when the upper eye of horus was invented it was sekhmet who took over her role on the pyramid top. Sekhmet was chiefly about power since water at altitude has more power than water on the ground. Bast is poorly attested in the PT and I have no reason to doubt that Egyptological interpretation of “her” is correct in a left handed sort of way. I can not put her firmly into the pantheon (ordered knowledge) with the scant clues available. I know only a few things about her characteristics which is insufficient to narrow the definition to a single point. Her definition is amorphous at this time.
Any answers?
871c Sometime’s I feel like a tiny island floating in the sea
872a Palm trees don’t get in the way, it’s a tropical ease
872b And everywhere that I keep my silence, no sound returns to me
872c Just endless waves at the end of our days, the sighing of the seas
No, it is not. You cannot say something is a “colloquial term” if you are the one and only person in the world using it in that manner.
Wrong. She is an Egyptian goddess.
If it hasn’t appeared anywhere at all it isn’t a term at all, let alone a vulgar term.
Everything about it is unknown as it relates to the great pyramid builders.
They have a fairly good handle on what it means to their descendents but nary a clue what it meant originally or how it fit into the thinking. This means when they read a line like “the inundation that brings green to the eye ion the midst of the field” they don’t know what it means or that the meaning was literal.
The definition used by Egyptologists is the exact same confused rendition that the descendents had. This is only “natural” because of the way meaning is sought in modern language. We are trying to understand the same untranslatable language that their descendents tried to understand and we are naturally misunderstanding it the exact same way. Their descendents then took this incorrect meaning and used it in their day to day lives for many centuries allowing the meaning to evolve and change further. Modern languages drift, the ancient one did not. It evolved but old versions were still comprehensible.
If it is untranslatable, then you don’t know what it says.
Correct?
Besides the nonsense that others pointed out in your post here, in another post you also declared that:
“The natron forced the eruption and it was the eruption (the inundation that tosses) that purified. “
You are actually making it worse, and that seemed to be impossible. Again, for embalming purposes the amount of natron mentioned in the PT is enough to purify and prepare the body. It is really an inadequate amount to neutralize the acid coming out of a cold water geyser.
Now you are also adding that the Alka Seltzer in the giant jug is the reason for the water coming out of the geyser in the first place.
Well, that is really a very dumb thing to propose, now besides a missing processing plant and tanks to properly treat the water coming out we have to add huge pressure pumps (with even more technology not acknowledged in ancient times) to force the natron into the ground, (no, dumping the water in a hole will not give you the same amount of water out, it will be much less because of very simple physics that include the loss of a very significant amount of water due to the ground absorbing a fair amount of it. To be effective you really need a pump to force more water underground) and with massive amounts of it too. Needless to say, no one that uses cold water geysers bothers to do that, the water and the materials for the reaction are already underground.
It is clear that your pitiful explanation here is to explain how the geyser could be made to be reliable, it would be reliable all right, in the sense that it would not do anything as the amount of natron and water pumped underground would not be adequate to make a geyser that would do the specified job that you have in mind.
As noted, you are only making things worse for your nonsensical idea.
He’s using some other form of logic that only he understands. Even the ancient Egyptians didn’t understand it but they did have a symbol of an owl with it’s head up it’s ass to describe it.
What is the approximate diameter of the opening through which the water sprayed?
I was going to say something like ‘you seem to be getting confused’, but it’s clear that confusion is your personal Jedi way. To clarify, however, YOU were the one claiming special insight and mystical knowledge, not I. I make no such claims. It’s clear that YOUR claims of mystical sooper sekrit knowledge of language (that you got without bothering to study language) is only a real thing in your own mind. Repeatedly you’ve been challenged on this point by several posters who DO know more than the average person about the PT and about Egyptian hieroglyphs…something it’s equally clear you DON’T know much about, except your own twisted theories.
To save you time looking back, he actually answered this earlier…he claimed (IIRC) the Egyptians drilled a hole into the ‘cold geyser’ and the diameter was 5".
His assertion that this was the ‘Eye of Horus’ is, of course, HIS assertion, and is backed up by the same weight of overwhelming evidence he’s backed up all of his claims…he thinks it’s so based on his special knowledge and abilities.
I’ll take a break from derision now to point out that cladking has been very entertaining, he has a fertile imagination and he’s been a good sport about the criticism and ridicule. Too bad he can’t put that effort into making sense and intellectual honesty.
I was inquiring about the so-called “upper eye of Horus” which received the water at the top of the geyser’s spray.