In this thread
Trend: Men happier, women not so much. Reckon why?
The discussion about happiness and age seems to keep coming back in many people’s minds to the concept that people have a low sense of self worth.
As a society we’ve progressed on a variety of fronts, and many things that were considered luxuries or ideals in the past are now considered rights.
The right to political self determination (the right to vote in fair elections, to protest, to confront politicians) is not considered a luxury, but more of a right that comes from living in an advanced nation.
The right to health (in the form of accessible health care) is not considered a luxury by most nations. Even in the US the concept of health care is considered a right by a majority of the public.
The right to physical self determination (to choose your own vocation, to move around at will, to put whatever you want in your body, to learn whatever you want to learn) are generally accepted in advanced societies (minus the issue of illegal drugs).
The right to be treated with dignity in the form of the abolishment of torture, arbitrary detention and overt discrimination.
etc.
So why have no advances in the concept that people are entitled to innate self worth independent of external achievements ever come about? It seems that across national boundaries that various right like the ones listed in the universal declaration of human rights are expanding across the board nearly everywhere. However the concept that an individual has innate value and worth, and is worth more than the sum of their achievements (their social status, income, education, relationships, appearance, etc) or lack thereof has not.
How/why have we created a society where being able to vote is considered a right people will fight for, but having innate self worth which is independent of your external accomplishments (appearance, income, education, relationships) is not? Why is being physically beaten by authorities for committing crimes considered morally unacceptable, but mentally berating yourself for social faux paus is acceptable?
Why have many societies determined that a person always has a right to health care no matter their income or social status, but a right to respect themselves is something you have to earn by having the right career, income, appearance or relationships?
This isn’t really about gender (men suffer from low self worth too), however the original thread was focused more on women.
What can be done to change that? Should that be changed?
Or is this not really changeable?
The problem is a society of individuals with no innate self worth is not going to fight as hard to protect their other rights (the right to vote, to self determination, to live free of abuse, etc). And life will be more miserable in that society too.
Is there something different about having innate self respect and self worth? If so, what is it? Why do people feel they have an innate right to vote, not be tortured and to have access to health care and education but not a right to innate self respect and self worth?
Is there something different about this issue, or have we just ignored it?
Oh man, I can’t wait to see the replies to this one.