It’s difficult to write objectively about our community theater, because I am pretty heavily involved in it. Over the past five or six years, I’ve performed in several plays and musicals, mainly in my city, but also in some neighboring towns that are maybe a half hour drive away. I played Patsy in Spamalot!, President Roosevelt in Annie, and one of the poker buddies in The Odd Couple, among other things. I also met my wife through the theater, so there’s that.
I think, with all modesty, that we’re generally pretty good. At the very least, we are relatively popular in the community. We have a 393-seat theater which often sells out, especially for the big musicals. We’ve won awards in regional theater competitions. Which is a big change: when I first started with the theater about six years ago, they were in pretty poor financial shape, and the building was falling apart. Over those six years, the theater has gotten much stronger, attendance has gone way up, and we’ve gotten grants that have helped repair a lot of the damage to the facility. Not that I’m taking credit for this change, mind you–it just happened to coincide with my time there. It was mostly hard work on the part of the Board and the Artistic Director.
You’re right that the director plays a huge role in the quality of the production, and it really can vary from show to show. I’ve been in shows that I’m tremendously proud of (Spamalot! was one), and I’ve been in shows that were, let’s say, not as good as they might have been. In community theater, you’re going to have very different levels of talent. One of the skills a good director has is to get the best performance possible out of everyone. Interestingly I kind of butted heads with the director of Spamalot! quite a lot, but it was worth it because he staged an excellent show. By contrast, directors who are uncertain, or who don’t take a strong enough role in guiding their casts, can produce some truly dire results. I’ve been in shows where the director was very hands-off, didn’t give us any feel for what he was after, didn’t control people who wanted to show off rather than contribute to the good of the play as a whole, and it’s an incredibly frustrating experience.
There’s an old saying, but it’s very true: If one or two performances are good, credit the actors. If all of the performances are good, credit the director.
Some community theaters can be very clique-ish. They’ll have a regular batch of people who always get the lead roles, always get to be the featured dancer, and so forth. Not that those people aren’t good, mind you, but in my opinion that’s a way to insure burn-out among the performers, and to discourage new people from getting involved. Who wants to audition for a show if you know you don’t have any realistic chance to get a good part? A truly healthy community theater will always be looking for new faces at each audition, and will be sure to give those new faces a chance so that they’ll want to come back.